Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
作者信息
Gray Alicia D
出版信息
Tex Tech Law Rev. 1981;12(2):483-99.
PMID:11655635
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Tex Tech Law Rev. 1981;12(2):483-99.
2
3
4
Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae.堕胎资金与明智的社会政策：哈里斯诉麦克雷案的影响
Women Health. 1980 Winter;5(4):79-83.
5
Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade.哈里斯诉麦克雷案：最高法院背离了罗诉韦德案。
Loyola Law Rev. 1980 Summer;26(3):749-60.
6
Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).宪法——卫生法——《海德修正案》的合宪性——医疗必需的堕胎无需由州或联邦政府根据医疗补助计划提供资金——哈里斯诉麦克雷案，美国最高法院判例汇编第448卷，第297页（1980年）
Whittier Law Rev. 1981;3(3):381-408.
7
Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall.哈里斯诉麦克雷案：海德修正案得以维持，而贫困女性的权利却受损。
KY Law J. 1980;69(2):359-91.
8
The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.最高法院关于堕胎资金问题：再次审议。
St Louis Univ Law J. 1981;25(2):411-27.
9
Amendment No. 2413 [(abortion funding[.第2413号修正案[(堕胎资金[。
Congr Rec (Dly Ed). 1980 Sep 29;126(152):S13703-11.
10
Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev. 1978;9(2):361-419.
Zotero 插件