相似文献
1
Ethical triumph, or surgical rape?
Solicit J. 1993 Nov 26;137(45):1182-3.
2
Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women.
J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Summer;27(2):171-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01449.x.
3
Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Clin Ethics Rep. 1991;5(1):1-16.
4
Refusal of treatment and the competent patient.
Eur J Health Law. 1994;1(4):367-75. doi: 10.1163/157180994x00042.
5
Blood transfusions, Jehovah's Witnesses and the rule of inviolability of the human body.
Rev Droit. 1974;5:156-76.
6
Statutory recognition of the right to die: the California Natural Death Act.
Boston Univ Law Rev. 1977 Jan;57(1):148-77.
7
Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 May;35(2):132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb01855.x.
8
In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting.
Nova Law Rev. 1989 Spring;13(2):649-69.
9
The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
Calif Law Rev. 1986 Dec;74(6):1951-2030.
10
Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
North Carol Law Rev. 1991 Nov;70(1):297-321.
Zotero 插件