Prilleltensky Isaac, Rossiter Amy, Walsh-Bowers Richard
Ethics Behav. 1996;6(4):287-306. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0604_1.
The first in a series of 4 articles, this article provides an overview of the concepts and methods developed by a team of researchers concerned with preventing harm and promoting ethical discourse in the helping professions. In this article we introduce conceptual, research, analytical, and action frameworks employed to promote the centrality of ethical discourse in mental health practice. We employ recursive processes whereby knowledge gained from case studies refines our emerging conceptual model of applied ethics. Our participatory conceptual framework differs markedly from the restrictive model typically used in applied ethics. Our research relies on lived experiences of ethics, while our analytical framework draws attention to the multiple levels and contexts in which ethical dilemmas take place. Finally, our action framework is designed to collaborate with research participants and practitioners in making use of our data and interpretations. We demonstrate how the various frameworks inform each other in an integrative fashion. The article sets the stage for 2 case studies presented in subsequent articles.
作为系列四篇文章中的第一篇,本文概述了一组研究人员所开发的概念和方法,这些研究人员关注在助人专业领域预防伤害并促进伦理话语。在本文中,我们介绍了用于促进伦理话语在心理健康实践中的核心地位的概念、研究、分析和行动框架。我们采用递归过程,通过案例研究获得的知识来完善我们新兴的应用伦理概念模型。我们的参与式概念框架与应用伦理中通常使用的限制性模型明显不同。我们的研究依赖于伦理的实际体验,而我们的分析框架则关注伦理困境发生的多个层面和背景。最后,我们的行动框架旨在与研究参与者和从业者合作,以利用我们的数据和解释。我们展示了各种框架如何以综合的方式相互影响。本文为后续文章中呈现的两个案例研究奠定了基础。