Kaczor Christopher
Christ Bioeth. 1998 Aug;4(2):183-201. doi: 10.1076/chbi.4.2.183.6904.
Aquinas's conception of the relationship of faith and reason calls into question the arguments and some of the conclusions advanced in contributions to the debate on physician-assisted suicide by David Thomasma and H. Tristram Engelhardt. An understanding of the nature of theology as based on revelation calls into question Thomasma's theological argument in favor of physician-assisted suicide based on the example of Christ and the martyrs. On the other hand, unaided reason calls into question his assumptions about the nature of death as in some cases a good for the human person. Finally, if Aquinas is right about the relationship of faith and reason, Engelhardt's sharp contrast between "Christian" and "secular" approaches to physician-assisted suicide needs reconsideration, although his conclusions about physician-assisted suicide would find support.
阿奎那关于信仰与理性关系的概念,对大卫·托马斯马和H. 特里斯特拉姆·恩格尔哈特在关于医生协助自杀的辩论中所提出的论点及某些结论提出了质疑。将神学本质理解为基于启示,这对托马斯马以基督和殉道者为例支持医生协助自杀的神学论点提出了质疑。另一方面, unaided reason(此处原文有误,推测可能是“ unaided reason”,意为“纯粹理性”)对他关于死亡本质在某些情况下对人有益的假设提出了质疑。最后,如果阿奎那关于信仰与理性关系的观点是正确的,那么恩格尔哈特在医生协助自杀的“基督教”和“世俗”方法之间的鲜明对比就需要重新审视,尽管他关于医生协助自杀的结论会得到支持。