Morris John C
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):49-57.
Conflicts of interest and other ethical dilemmas occur in Alzheimer disease (AD) patient care and research but often are underrecognized by physicians. One or more bioethical principles of autonomy, confidentiality, truth telling, beneficence, and justice, which apply to demented individuals as they do to other patients, may conflict in everyday clinical situations. For example, when demented patients wish to continue driving, autonomy (the patient's right to self-determination) conflicts with beneficence (the duty to promote the patient's welfare). Cognitively impaired patients depend on others for ethical decision making in the resolution of these dilemmas. It is essential that clinicians and investigators involved in the decision-making process do so without bias or conflict of interest. Full disclosure of financial interests increasingly is an accepted requirement in the conduct of biomedical research. In AD, less obvious potential conflicts of interest arise when physicians recruit their patients for antidementia drug trials sponsored by a pharmaceutical company (that provides the physician with research funding) or when investigators fail to acknowledge the patient's withdrawal of assent when attempting to complete a research protocol. The recognition of both financial and nonfinancial conflicts should lead to measures to reduce bias, which in turn will improve the integrity of research findings and promote patient welfare.
利益冲突和其他伦理困境在阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的护理和研究中时有发生,但医生往往对此认识不足。适用于痴呆患者的自主、保密、告知真相、行善和公正等一项或多项生物伦理原则,与适用于其他患者时一样,在日常临床情况下可能会相互冲突。例如,当痴呆患者希望继续开车时,自主(患者的自决权)与行善(促进患者福祉的义务)就会产生冲突。认知受损患者在解决这些困境时依赖他人进行伦理决策。参与决策过程的临床医生和研究人员必须做到没有偏见或利益冲突。在生物医学研究中,充分披露经济利益越来越成为一项公认的要求。在AD研究中,当医生招募自己的患者参加由制药公司赞助(该公司为医生提供研究资金)的抗痴呆药物试验时,或者当研究人员在试图完成研究方案时未承认患者撤回同意时,就会出现不太明显的潜在利益冲突。认识到经济和非经济冲突都应促使采取措施减少偏见,这反过来将提高研究结果的可信度并促进患者福祉。