• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症研究的预先同意。

Advance consent for dementia research.

作者信息

Sachs Greg A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):19-27.

PMID:11657670
Abstract

Informed consent is a fundamental ethical concern for dementia research that involves the participation of human subjects. The central dilemma is how to obtain valid informed consent from a population of potential subjects who are losing their decision-making capacity while still providing adequate protection for this vulnerable group of people. One model for informed consent for dementia research would be to obtain consent in advance of the loss of decision-making capacity, perhaps using written advance directives similar to those used for clinical decisions on life-sustaining treatments. This article examines the advance consent model, contrasts the life-sustaining treatment arena with dementia research issues, and suggests that written advance consent should not be required to conduct dementia research. Instead, an argument is presented in favor of a more informal advance consent process that builds upon the existing practice of using subject assent plus proxy consent.

摘要

知情同意是涉及人类受试者参与的痴呆症研究的一个基本伦理问题。核心困境在于如何从一群正在丧失决策能力的潜在受试者中获得有效的知情同意,同时仍为这一弱势群体提供充分保护。痴呆症研究的一种知情同意模式是在丧失决策能力之前获得同意,或许可以使用类似于用于维持生命治疗的临床决策的书面预先指示。本文探讨了预先同意模式,将维持生命治疗领域与痴呆症研究问题进行了对比,并表明进行痴呆症研究不应要求书面预先同意。相反,本文提出了一种支持更非正式的预先同意程序的观点,该程序建立在使用受试者同意加代理人同意的现有做法之上。

相似文献

1
Advance consent for dementia research.痴呆症研究的预先同意。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):19-27.
2
Proxy decision making in Alzheimer disease research: durable powers of attorney, guardianship, and other alternatives.阿尔茨海默病研究中的代理决策:持久授权书、监护及其他替代方案。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):28-37.
3
Conflicts of interest: research and clinical care.利益冲突:研究与临床护理
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):49-57.
4
Introduction (to 6 articles and a position paper on ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research).引言(关于阿尔茨海默病研究中的伦理和法律问题的6篇文章及1篇立场文件)
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):1-4.
5
Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness.针对精神疾病患者的预先指示文书。
Univ Miami Law Rev. 1996 Oct;51(1):57-95.
6
Special care unit research: ethical issues.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 1):S360-7.
7
Practical ethical issues related to the care of elderly people with dementia.与痴呆症老年人护理相关的实际伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 1994 Sep;1(3):151-62. doi: 10.1177/096973309400100304.
8
The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Milbank Q. 1986;64(Suppl. 2):95-162.
9
Appointing an agent to make medical treatment choices.指定一名代理人来做出医疗治疗选择。
Columbia Law Rev. 1984 May;84(4):985-1031.
10
Guidelines for addressing ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research: a position paper.阿尔茨海默病研究中伦理与法律问题的应对指南:立场文件
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):66-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review.参与紧急情况随机对照试验的预先同意:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 7;13(2):e066742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066742.
2
(Re)Conceptualising 'good' proxy decision-making for research: the implications for proxy consent decision quality.(重新)概念化“好”的研究代理决策:对代理同意决策质量的影响。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jul 18;23(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00809-5.
3
Navigating ethical challenges of conducting randomized clinical trials on COVID-19.
应对新冠病毒随机临床试验中的伦理挑战。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13010-022-00115-3.
4
Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review.参与急性护理随机对照试验的预先同意:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):e039172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039172.
5
Advances and challenges in conducting ethical trials involving populations lacking capacity to consent: A decade in review.缺乏同意能力人群参与的伦理试验的进展与挑战:十年回顾。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;95:106054. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106054. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
6
Assessment of the Perceived Acceptability of an Early Enrollment Strategy Using Advance Consent in Health Care-Associated Pneumonia.使用预先同意评估医疗相关性肺炎提前入组策略的可接受性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185816. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5816.
7
Ethical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.姑息治疗中谵妄研究的伦理挑战与解决方案。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Aug;48(2):259-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
8
Capacity to consent to biomedical research's evaluation among older cognitively impaired patients. A study to validate the University of California Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent questionnaire in French among older cognitively impaired patients.在认知障碍的老年患者中同意进行生物医学研究评估的能力。在认知障碍的老年患者中用法语验证加利福尼亚大学简短评估同意能力问卷的研究。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2013 Apr;17(4):385-9. doi: 10.1007/s12603-013-0036-5.
9
Informed consent to research in long-term care settings.长期护理机构中研究的知情同意。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Jul;2(3):153-61. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20090428-03. Epub 2009 May 29.
10
Advance directives for subjects of research who have fluctuating cognitive impairments due to psychotic disorders (such as schizophrenia).针对因精神疾病(如精神分裂症)导致认知功能波动受损的研究对象的预先指示。
Community Ment Health J. 1998 Jun;34(3):229-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1018709606374.