Hayashi Miki, Hasui Chieko, Kitamura Fusako, Murakami Masaaki, Takeuchi Mika, Katoh Hisao, Kitamura Toshinori
Ethics Behav. 2000;10(1):51-63. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1001_4.
Some people in Japan are still comfortable with the paternalistic role of doctors, but others wish that their own decisions would receive a greater amount of respect. A total of 747 students of universities and colleges and 114 parents of these students participated in a questionnaire survey. Most of the participants thought that autonomy should be respected in situations involving death with dignity and euthanasia, whereas it should not be respected in attempted suicide and involuntary admission of individuals with mental illness. A cluster analysis revealed that the participants could be divided into the following groups: aid in dying advocates (n=577), complete libertarians (n=109), protectors of the mentally ill (n=90), complete paternalists (n=29), and questionables (n=27). The assertion of independence score of the Scale for Independent and Interdependent Construal of the Self showed a significant difference among the 5 clusters. These findings suggest that the traditional paternalistic relationship between doctor and patient is undergoing a gradual transformation in Japan.
在日本,一些人仍然认同医生家长式的角色,但另一些人则希望自己的决定能得到更多尊重。共有747名大学生和114名这些学生的家长参与了问卷调查。大多数参与者认为,在尊严死和安乐死的情况下,自主权应得到尊重,而在自杀未遂和精神疾病患者的非自愿收治情况中,自主权不应得到尊重。聚类分析显示,参与者可分为以下几组:临终关怀倡导者(n = 577)、完全自由主义者(n = 109)、精神病患者保护者(n = 90)、完全家长主义者(n = 29)和存疑者(n = 27)。自我独立与相互依赖构念量表的独立性主张得分在这5个类别之间存在显著差异。这些发现表明,在日本,传统的医患家长式关系正在逐渐转变。