Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.
出版信息
Harv Law Rev. 1973 May;86(7):1282-306.
PMID:11664219
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.怀亚特诉斯蒂克尼案以及被民事收治的精神病患者获得充分治疗的权利。
Harv Law Rev. 1973 May;86(7):1282-306.
2
Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment.宪法——正当程序——非自愿被民事收容的精神病人享有接受治疗的宪法权利。
Univ Kans Law Rev. 1974 Fall;23(1):188-205.
3
Relief for the civilly committed: a constitutional right to treatment.被民事拘押者的救济：获得治疗的宪法权利。
KY Law J. 1974;63(2):469-89.
4
Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.争取被民事强制收治的精神病人的治疗权。
UMKC Law Rev. 1975 Fall;44(1):23-48.
5
Judicial implementation and Wyatt v. Stickney.
Ala Law Rev. 1981 Winter;32(2):299-312.
6
Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.非自愿民事住院治疗：接受治疗的权利与拒绝治疗的权利。
Psychiatr Ann. 1977 May;7(5):50-51+.
7
The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Public Interest. 1977 Winter(46).
8
The Constitution v. the snakepit.《宪法》对决“蛇坑”。
N Y Times Mag. 1974;17 Mar 1974.
9
Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.唐纳森诉奥康纳案：非自愿民事收容者接受治疗的宪法权利。
North Carol Centr Law J. 1975 Fall;7(1):174-86.
10
Analysis of the opinions in Donaldson v. O'Connor and Wyatt v. Aderholt.对唐纳森诉奥康纳案和怀亚特诉阿德霍尔特案中观点的分析。
Ment Retard Law. 1974 Nov:1-6.
Zotero 插件