Voluntarily confined mental retardates: the right to treatment vs. the right to protection from harm.
作者信息
Barshefsky Charlene, Liebenberg Roberta
出版信息
Cathol Univers Law Rev. 1974 Summer;23(4):787-805.
PMID:11664363
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Voluntarily confined mental retardates: the right to treatment vs. the right to protection from harm.
Cathol Univers Law Rev. 1974 Summer;23(4):787-805.
2
The right to treatment and the psychiatric establishment.
Psychiatr Ann. 1974 Sep;4(9):21-23+.
3
The Constitution v. the snakepit.《宪法》对决“蛇坑”。
N Y Times Mag. 1974;17 Mar 1974.
4
Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.非自愿民事住院治疗：接受治疗的权利与拒绝治疗的权利。
Psychiatr Ann. 1977 May;7(5):50-51+.
5
Federal court order brings big changes in lives of mentally ill and retarded patients in Alabama.
Wall St J (East Ed). 1973 Dec 18:42.
6
Deprivation of liberty and the right to treatment.
Clgh Rev. 1974 Jan;7(9):519-28.
7
Postcommitment: an analysis and reevaluation of the right to treatment.承诺后：对治疗权的分析与重新评估
Notre Dame Lawyer. 1975 Dec;51(2):287-302.
8
Ethical issues in inpatient practice.住院医疗实践中的伦理问题。
Psychiatr Med Update Mass Gen Hosp Rev Physicians. 1986;4(4):445-54.
9
Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.怀亚特诉斯蒂克尼案以及被民事收治的精神病患者获得充分治疗的权利。
Harv Law Rev. 1973 May;86(7):1282-306.
10
Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.权利与尊严：国会、最高法院以及潘恩赫斯特案后的残疾人权益
West New Engl Law Rev. 1983 Winter;5(3):327-61.
Zotero 插件