Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy.
作者信息
Flaschner Franklin N
出版信息
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 1974;18(3):283-301. doi: 10.1177/0306624X7401800311.
PMID:11664409
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy.美国精神病患者强制收治中的宪法要求：自由权与治疗权
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 1974;18(3):283-301. doi: 10.1177/0306624X7401800311.
2
United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
J Psychiatry Law. 1985 Spring-Summer;13(1-2):137-64. doi: 10.1177/0093185385013001-209.
3
Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization: a review of the statutes regulating the social control of the mentally ill.
Deviant Behav. 1985;6:287-318. doi: 10.1080/01639625.1985.9967679.
4
An overview of state involuntary civil commitment statutes.
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep. 1984 May-Jun;8(3):328-35.
5
Overt dangerous behavior as a constitutional requirement for involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill.明显危险行为作为对精神病患者非自愿民事收容的一项宪法要求。
Univ Chic Law Rev. 1977 Spring;44(3):562-93.
6
If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?如果民事收容是解决儿童问题的答案，那么问题是什么呢？
George Washington Law Rev. 1983 Jan;51(2):171-218.
7
8
Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.宪法——自由权——对精神病患者的非自愿拘禁。
Tenn Law Rev. 1976 Winter;43(2):366-73.
9
A review of the Burger Court: Part I.对伯格法院的回顾：第一部分。
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep. 1984 Nov-Dec;8(6):502-8.
10
Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.宪法——对非危险性精神疾病患者进行民事强制收容的单纯监禁违反了宪法规定的自由权。
Suffolk Univ Law Rev. 1975 Fall;10(1):76-99.
Zotero 插件