O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
作者信息
Fields Jeffrey D
出版信息
Hofstra Law Rev. 1976 Winter;4(2):511-30.
PMID:11664626
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
2
Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.最高法院裁定反对对无危险性的精神病患者进行非自愿监禁。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1975 Sep;26(9):616+.
3
o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.奥康纳诉唐纳森案：非危险性精神疾病患者的自由权
Ohio North Univ Law Rev. 1975;3(2):550-62.
4
Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.宪法——对非危险性精神疾病患者进行民事强制收容的单纯监禁违反了宪法规定的自由权。
Suffolk Univ Law Rev. 1975 Fall;10(1):76-99.
5
O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.奥康纳诉唐纳森案：最高法院回避了接受治疗的权利。
Calif West Law Rev. 1976;13(1):168-87.
6
o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.奥康纳诉唐纳森案：州立医院精神病人的正当程序权利
Rev Law Soc Change. 1976 Winter;6(1):65-82.
7
o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?奥康纳诉唐纳森案：治疗权的交换条件论证之死？
Clevel State Law Rev. 1975;24(3):557-71.
8
Involuntary psychiatry.非自愿精神病学。
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev. 1976;45(3):347-65.
9
The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson: a reply to Bernard.奥康纳诉唐纳森案对心理学的意义：对伯纳德的回应
Am Psychol. 1978 Sep;33(9):858-61. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.33.9.858.
10
Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.唐纳森诉奥康纳案：非自愿民事收容者接受治疗的宪法权利。
North Carol Centr Law J. 1975 Fall;7(1):174-86.
引用本文的文献
1
Ethical and Legal Aspects of Evaluating and Treating Mood Disorders.评估与治疗心境障碍的伦理与法律问题
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2025 Apr;23(2):208-211. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20240041. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
Zotero 插件