O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
作者信息
Winthrop Lawrence F
出版信息
Calif West Law Rev. 1976;13(1):168-87.
PMID:11664747
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.奥康纳诉唐纳森案：最高法院回避了接受治疗的权利。
Calif West Law Rev. 1976;13(1):168-87.
2
3
o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.奥康纳诉唐纳森案：非危险性精神疾病患者的自由权
Ohio North Univ Law Rev. 1975;3(2):550-62.
4
o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?奥康纳诉唐纳森案：治疗权的交换条件论证之死？
Clevel State Law Rev. 1975;24(3):557-71.
5
Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.最高法院裁定反对对无危险性的精神病患者进行非自愿监禁。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1975 Sep;26(9):616+.
6
o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.奥康纳诉唐纳森案：州立医院精神病人的正当程序权利
Rev Law Soc Change. 1976 Winter;6(1):65-82.
7
Involuntary psychiatry.非自愿精神病学。
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev. 1976;45(3):347-65.
8
The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson: a reply to Bernard.奥康纳诉唐纳森案对心理学的意义：对伯纳德的回应
Am Psychol. 1978 Sep;33(9):858-61. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.33.9.858.
9
Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.唐纳森诉奥康纳案：非自愿民事收容者接受治疗的宪法权利。
North Carol Centr Law J. 1975 Fall;7(1):174-86.
10
The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev. 1976 Winter;47(2):299-323.
Zotero 插件