• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3.0T高分辨率颅内及颈部磁共振血管造影:技术要点与初步经验

High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience.

作者信息

Bernstein M A, Huston J, Lin C, Gibbs G F, Felmlee J P

机构信息

Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2001 Nov;46(5):955-62. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1282.

DOI:10.1002/mrm.1282
PMID:11675648
Abstract

Initial experience with intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T is reported. Phantom measurements (corrected for relaxation effects) show S/N (3.0T) = 2.14 +/- 0.08 x S/N (1.5T) in identical-geometry head coils. A 3.0T 3DTOF intracranial imaging protocol with higher-order autoshimming was developed and compared to 1.5T 3DTOF in 12 patients with aneurysms. A comparison by two radiologists showed the 3.0T to be significantly better (P < 0.001) for visualization of the aneurysms. The feasibility of cervical and intracranial contrast enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) at 3.0T is also examined. The relaxivity of the gadolinium contrast agent decreases by only about 4-7% when the field strength is increased from 1.5 to 3.0T. Cervical 3.0T CEMRA was obtained in eight patients, two of whom had 1.5T studies available for direct comparison. Image comparison suggests 3.0T to be a favorable field strength for cervical CEMRA. Voxel volumes of 0.62-0.73 mm(3) (not including zero-filling) were readily achieved at 3.0T with the use of a single-channel transmit-receive head or cervical coil, a 25 mL bolus of gadoteridol, and a 3D pulse sequence with a 66% sampling efficiency. This spatial resolution allowed visualization of intracranial aneurysms, carotid dissections, and atherosclerotic disease including ulcerations. Potential drawbacks of 3.0T MRA are increased SAR and T()(2) dephasing compared to 1.5T. Image comparison suggests signal loss due to T()(2) dephasing will not be substantially more problematic than at 1.5T. The dependence of RF power deposition on TR for CEMRA is calculated and discussed.

摘要

本文报道了3.0T场强下颅内和颈部MRA的初步经验。模体测量(校正了弛豫效应)显示,在相同几何形状的头部线圈中,S/N(3.0T)= 2.14±0.08×S/N(1.5T)。开发了一种采用高阶自动匀场的3.0T 3DTOF颅内成像方案,并与12例动脉瘤患者的1.5T 3DTOF进行比较。两位放射科医生的比较结果显示,3.0T在动脉瘤可视化方面明显更好(P < 0.001)。还研究了3.0T场强下颈部和颅内对比增强磁共振血管造影(CEMRA)的可行性。当场强从1.5T增加到3.0T时,钆对比剂的弛豫率仅降低约4 - 7%。对8例患者进行了颈部3.0T CEMRA检查,其中2例有1.5T的研究结果可供直接比较。图像比较表明,3.0T是颈部CEMRA的有利场强。在3.0T场强下,使用单通道发射 - 接收头部或颈部线圈、25 mL钆特醇团注以及采样效率为66%的3D脉冲序列,很容易实现0.62 - 0.73 mm³的体素体积(不包括零填充)。这种空间分辨率能够显示颅内动脉瘤、颈动脉夹层以及包括溃疡在内的动脉粥样硬化疾病。与1.5T相比,3.0T MRA的潜在缺点是比吸收率(SAR)增加和T₂失相。图像比较表明,T₂失相导致的信号丢失不会比1.5T时更严重。计算并讨论了CEMRA中射频功率沉积对重复时间(TR)的依赖性。

相似文献

1
High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience.3.0T高分辨率颅内及颈部磁共振血管造影:技术要点与初步经验
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Nov;46(5):955-62. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1282.
2
High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: a feasibility study.使用3.0T正交体线圈对主动脉弓上动脉进行高空间分辨率对比增强磁共振血管造影:一项可行性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2007 Mar;17(3):618-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0406-z. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
3
Comparison of intracranial 3D-ToF-MRA with and without parallel acquisition techniques at 1.5T and 3.0T: preliminary results.1.5T和3.0T场强下采用与不采用并行采集技术的颅内三维时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影术比较:初步结果
Acta Radiol. 2004 May;45(3):327-32. doi: 10.1080/02841850410004229.
4
Time-resolved contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck at 3.0 tesla: initial results.3.0特斯拉头部和颈部的时间分辨对比增强磁共振血管造影:初步结果
Invest Radiol. 2006 Feb;41(2):116-24. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000192416.19801.ca.
5
Effects of Imaging Parameters on the Quality of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of Cerebral Aneurysms Treated Using Stent-Assisted Coiling: A Phantom Study.成像参数对使用支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗的脑动脉瘤对比增强磁共振血管造影质量的影响:一项体模研究
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017 Apr 10;16(2):146-151. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2016-0042. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
6
3.0 Tesla high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the pulmonary circulation: initial experience with a 32-channel phased array coil using a high relaxivity contrast agent.3.0特斯拉高空间分辨率肺循环对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA):使用高弛豫率对比剂的32通道相控阵线圈的初步经验。
Invest Radiol. 2007 Jun;42(6):392-8. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000261937.77365.6a.
7
0.125 mm(3) spatial resolution steady-state MR angiography of the thighs with a blood pool contrast agent using the quadrature body coil only at 1.5 Tesla.仅使用正交体线圈,在1.5特斯拉磁场下,采用血池造影剂对大腿进行0.125毫米(3)空间分辨率的稳态磁共振血管造影。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Oct;40(4):996-1001. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24455. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
8
Assessment of 3D-TOF-MRA at 3.0 Tesla in the characterization of the angioarchitecture of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study.3.0特斯拉3D-TOF-MRA对脑动静脉畸形血管构筑特征的评估:一项初步研究。
Acta Radiol. 2007 Jul;48(6):678-86. doi: 10.1080/02841850701326958.
9
Three-dimensional breathhold SSFP coronary MRA: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T.三维屏气稳态自由进动冠状动脉磁共振血管造影:1.5T与3.0T的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Aug;22(2):206-12. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20374.
10
Supra-aortic low-dose contrast-enhanced time-resolved magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3 T: comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography and high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography.3T 时主动脉弓低剂量对比剂增强时间分辨磁共振(MR)血管造影:与时间飞跃 MR 血管造影及高分辨率对比剂增强 MR 血管造影的比较
Acta Radiol. 2015 Jun;56(6):673-80. doi: 10.1177/0284185114538426. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the imaging performance of time-of-flight MRA and ultrashort echo time MRA in flow diverters: A phantom study.血流导向装置中飞行时间磁共振血管造影(TOF-MRA)与超短回波时间磁共振血管造影(UTE-MRA)成像性能的比较:体模研究
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 23:15910199241285471. doi: 10.1177/15910199241285471.
2
Fenestrated Anterior Communicating Artery Complex Mimicking an Unruptured Aneurysm: Diagnostic Pitfall.酷似未破裂动脉瘤的有孔前交通动脉复合体:诊断陷阱。
Asian J Neurosurg. 2023 Mar 31;18(1):201-205. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1764119. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Impact of deep learning reconstruction on intracranial 1.5 T magnetic resonance angiography.
深度学习重建对颅内 1.5T 磁共振血管成像的影响。
Jpn J Radiol. 2022 May;40(5):476-483. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01225-2. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Quantitative time-of-flight MR angiography for simultaneous luminal and hemodynamic evaluation of the intracranial arteries.定量时间飞跃磁共振血管成像在颅内动脉腔内和血流动力学评估中的应用。
Magn Reson Med. 2022 Jan;87(1):150-162. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28969. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
5
Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography Without Contrast and Triggering (REACT) for Fast Imaging of Extracranial Arteries in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 3 T.3T 下急性缺血性脑卒中颅外动脉快速成像的无对比剂和触发的增强血管弛豫技术(REACT)
Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Sep;31(3):815-826. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00963-6. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
Lattice-Boltzmann interactive blood flow simulation pipeline.晶格玻尔兹曼交互血流模拟流水线。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Apr;15(4):629-639. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02120-3. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
More than BOLD: Dual-spin populations create functional contrast.不止是 BOLD:双重自旋群体产生功能对比。
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Feb;83(2):681-694. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27941. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
8
Surveillance of Unruptured Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms Using Noncontrast 3D-Black-Blood MRI: Comparison of 3D-TOF and Contrast-Enhanced MRA with 3D-DSA.未破裂颅内囊状动脉瘤的非增强 3D 黑血 MRI 监测:3D-TOF 和对比增强 MRA 与 3D-DSA 的比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jun;40(6):960-966. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6080. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Nonenhanced hybridized arterial spin labeled magnetic resonance angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries using a fast low angle shot readout at 3 Tesla.在3特斯拉磁场下,使用快速低角度激发读出序列的非增强杂交动脉自旋标记磁共振血管造影术用于颅外颈动脉成像。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Apr 12;18:18. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0238-1.
10
MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.发育中大脑的磁共振成像评估与安全性
Semin Perinatol. 2015 Mar;39(2):73-104. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Mar 3.