Clark L
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, School of Nursing, Denver 80262, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Nov;53(10):1303-20. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00411-1.
Do Mexicanas receive social support from a close network of family and friends during the perinatal period? To answer this question, a longitudinal ethnographic study followed 28 urban Mexican-origin women living in the US from their last trimester of pregnancy through their first month post-partum. A total of 93 interviews with Mexicanas focused on health and social support. All of the women lived in a large western city in the US but varied in their acculturation and income levels. Analyses identified four social support themes from women's experience (the emic analysis) and four social support typologies from the researcher (etic) analyses. The kinds of support women described as emanating from their support networks were inductively identified as Helping with Daily Hassles, Showing Love and Understanding, Being There for Me, and My Family Failing Me. Approximately half of the women reported densely supportive networks. The other women were disconnected from their support networks, or dealt with antagonism or instability in their networks. Women's perceptions of social support differed from the judgements made by the researcher about received support. Specifically, women perceived more network members in the supportive category than did the researcher by a factor of 1.4, and fewer network members in the disconnected category by a factor of 0.7. From an emic perspective, women listed only half as many antagonistic network members compared to the etic analysis (a factor of 0.50). These emic/etic discrepancies complicate clinical assessment of social support, but suggest that data on social support should be collected as part of the clinical processes of perinatal risking. To enhance assessment of social support, a clinically relevant guide is proposed for use by practitioners caring for Mexicanas in the perinatal period.
墨西哥裔美国女性在围产期是否能从亲密的家人和朋友网络中获得社会支持?为了回答这个问题,一项纵向人种志研究追踪了28名居住在美国的墨西哥裔城市女性,从她们怀孕的最后三个月一直到产后第一个月。对墨西哥裔美国女性进行了总共93次聚焦于健康和社会支持的访谈。所有这些女性都生活在美国西部的一个大城市,但她们的文化适应程度和收入水平各不相同。分析从女性的经历中确定了四个社会支持主题(主位分析),并从研究者的分析中确定了四种社会支持类型(客位分析)。女性所描述的来自其支持网络的支持类型被归纳为“帮助应对日常琐事”“表达爱与理解”“陪伴在我身边”以及“家人让我失望”。大约一半的女性报告称有密集的支持网络。其他女性则与她们的支持网络脱节,或者在网络中遭遇对抗或不稳定情况。女性对社会支持的认知与研究者对所获支持的判断有所不同。具体而言,女性认为处于支持类别的网络成员比研究者认定的多1.4倍,而处于脱节类别的网络成员比研究者认定的少0.7倍。从主位视角来看,与客位分析相比,女性列出的对抗性网络成员数量只有一半(系数为0.50)。这些主位/客位差异使社会支持的临床评估变得复杂,但表明社会支持数据应作为围产期风险临床过程的一部分加以收集。为了加强对社会支持的评估,本文提出了一份具有临床相关性的指南,供在围产期照顾墨西哥裔美国女性的从业者使用。