Improving outcomes in depression.
作者信息
Von Korff M, Goldberg D
出版信息
BMJ. 2001 Oct 27;323(7319):948-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7319.948.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Improving outcomes in depression.改善抑郁症的治疗效果。
BMJ. 2001 Oct 27;323(7319):948-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7319.948.
2
The treatment of anxiety and depression.焦虑症和抑郁症的治疗。
Br J Clin Pract. 1970 Feb;24(2):75-84.
3
FPIN's clinical inquiries. Psychosocial interventions delivered by primary care physicians to patients with depression.FPIN临床咨询。初级保健医生对抑郁症患者实施的心理社会干预。
Am Fam Physician. 2006 Nov 1;74(9):1580-1.
4
Antidepressants and counselling for major depression in primary care. Authors' conclusions were not justified by findings.基层医疗中治疗重度抑郁症的抗抑郁药与心理咨询。作者的结论没有得到研究结果的支持。
BMJ. 2001 Aug 4;323(7307):282; author reply 283.
5
[Some current aspects of antidepressive therapy].[抗抑郁治疗的一些当前方面]
Neurol Psihiatr Neurochir. 1967 Nov-Dec;12(6):485-94.
6
Pharmacotherapy of depression.抑郁症的药物治疗
Postgrad Med. 1973 Feb;53(2):147-52. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1973.11713374.
7
Collaborative care models for depression: time to move from evidence to practice.抑郁症的协作护理模式：从证据到实践的时候到了。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 27;166(21):2304-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.21.2304.
8
To the antidepressive properties of lithium and its place in the group of antidepressive drugs.论锂的抗抑郁特性及其在抗抑郁药物组中的地位。
Act Nerv Super (Praha). 1971;13(3):169-70.
9
Improving psychiatric drug therapy. A matter of dosage and choice.改善精神科药物治疗。剂量与选择问题。
Geriatrics. 1974 Jun;29(6):74-8.
10
Insomnia and depression: if it looks and walks like a duck..失眠与抑郁：如果它看起来像鸭子，走路也像鸭子……
Sleep. 2005 Nov;28(11):1362-3.
引用本文的文献
1
Mental health integrated care models in primary care and factors that contribute to their effective implementation: a scoping review.初级保健中的心理健康综合护理模式及其有效实施的影响因素：一项范围综述
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Feb 9;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00625-x.
2
Predictors and outcomes in primary depression care (POKAL) - a research training group develops an innovative approach to collaborative care.原发性抑郁症治疗中的预测因素和结局（POKAL） - 一个研究培训组开发出一种创新的合作护理方法。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Dec 2;23(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01913-6.
3
Study protocol for the antidepressant advisor (ADeSS): a decision support system for antidepressant treatment for depression in UK primary care: a feasibility study.抗抑郁药顾问（ADeSS）研究方案：英国初级保健中用于治疗抑郁症的抗抑郁药治疗的决策支持系统：一项可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 24;10(5):e035905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035905.
4
Pharmacy-based management for depression in adults.基于药房的成人抑郁症管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 23;12(12):CD013299. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013299.pub2.
5
Is care really shared? A systematic review of collaborative care (shared care) interventions for adult cancer patients with depression.关怀真的是共享的吗？对成年癌症合并抑郁症患者的协作式护理（共享护理）干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 14;19(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3946-z.
6
The GET READY relapse prevention programme for anxiety and depression: a mixed-methods study protocol.《GET READY 复发预防计划用于焦虑和抑郁：一项混合方法研究方案》
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2034-6.
7
Antidepressant prescription patterns and CNS polypharmacy with antidepressants among children, adolescents, and young adults: a population-based study in Sweden.抗抑郁药处方模式与儿童、青少年和年轻成年人中枢神经药物联用：瑞典一项基于人群的研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;28(8):1137-1145. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-01269-2. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
8
Collaborative care for depression in general practice: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.全科医疗中抑郁症的协作护理：一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2064-7.
9
Does a complex intervention increase patient knowledge about oral anticoagulation? - a cluster-randomised controlled trial.一项复杂干预措施能否增加患者对抗凝治疗的了解？一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Feb 7;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0588-2.
10
Collaborative care intervention for the perceived care needs of women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant therapy after surgery: a feasibility study.针对术后接受辅助治疗的乳腺癌女性患者感知到的护理需求的协作式护理干预：一项可行性研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;47(3):213-220. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw189.
本文引用的文献
1
Cost-effectiveness of a collaborative care program for primary care patients with persistent depression.针对患有持续性抑郁症的初级保健患者的协作护理计划的成本效益。
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Oct;158(10):1638-44. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1638.
2
Cost-effectiveness of practice-initiated quality improvement for depression: results of a randomized controlled trial.实践发起的抑郁症质量改进的成本效益：一项随机对照试验的结果
JAMA. 2001 Sep 19;286(11):1325-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.11.1325.
3
Rethinking practitioner roles in chronic illness: the specialist, primary care physician, and the practice nurse.重新思考慢性病领域从业者的角色：专科医生、初级保健医生及执业护士。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2001 May-Jun;23(3):138-44. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(01)00136-0.
4
Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment for high utilizers of general medical care.针对普通医疗高利用率人群的系统性抑郁症治疗的成本效益
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;58(2):181-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.2.181.
5
Synchrony of change in depression and disability: what next?抑郁与残疾变化的同步性：下一步是什么？
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;57(4):381-2. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.4.381.
6
Individualized stepped care of chronic illness.慢性病的个体化阶梯式护理。
West J Med. 2000 Feb;172(2):133-7. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.172.2.133.
7
Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial.临床实践指南及基于实践的教育对基层医疗中抑郁症检测及转归的影响：汉普郡抑郁症项目随机对照试验
Lancet. 2000 Jan 15;355(9199):185-91. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03171-2.
8
9
Cost-effectiveness of treatments for major depression in primary care practice.基层医疗实践中重度抑郁症治疗的成本效益
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;55(7):645-51. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.7.645.
10
Treatment costs, cost offset, and cost-effectiveness of collaborative management of depression.抑郁症协作管理的治疗成本、成本抵消及成本效益
Psychosom Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;60(2):143-9. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199803000-00005.
Zotero 插件