• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外受精的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization.

作者信息

Collins J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Semin Reprod Med. 2001 Sep;19(3):279-89. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18047.

DOI:10.1055/s-2001-18047
PMID:11679909
Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is an effective but underutilized treatment for long-standing infertility. The median projected cost per IVF cycle in 2001 in the United States would be $9226 and $3531 in 25 other countries, based on previously published estimates. The cost per delivery arising from IVF cycles in 2001 in the United States would average $56,419, and $20,522 in eight other countries, based on previously published estimates. The cost-effectiveness of IVF has not been proven in three randomized controlled trials, but these trials are difficult to design and implement. Multiple gestation births significantly increase the cost of IVF treatment. IVF multiple births cost 36% more than the IVF cycles that gave rise to the multiple births. The uptake of IVF in most countries falls short of the minimum 1500 cycles per annum that would be needed per million population. Comparative international data indicate that infertile couples would increase their uptake of IVF services if the price were lower.

摘要

体外受精(IVF)是治疗长期不孕症的一种有效但未得到充分利用的方法。根据此前公布的估计,2001年美国每个体外受精周期的预计成本中位数为9226美元,其他25个国家为3531美元。根据此前公布的估计,2001年美国因体外受精周期导致的每次分娩成本平均为56419美元,其他八个国家为20522美元。在三项随机对照试验中,体外受精的成本效益尚未得到证实,但这些试验难以设计和实施。多胎妊娠显著增加了体外受精治疗的成本。体外受精多胎分娩的成本比导致多胎分娩的体外受精周期高出36%。在大多数国家,体外受精的应用率低于每百万人口每年所需的最低1500个周期。国际比较数据表明,如果价格降低,不孕夫妇会增加对体外受精服务的使用。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization.体外受精的成本效益
Semin Reprod Med. 2001 Sep;19(3):279-89. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18047.
2
Cost-effectiveness of seven IVF strategies: results of a Markov decision-analytic model.七种体外受精策略的成本效益:马尔可夫决策分析模型的结果
Hum Reprod. 2009 Jul;24(7):1648-55. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep041. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
3
Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis.辅助生殖是精索静脉曲张相关性男性不育的最佳治疗方法吗?一项成本效益分析。
Urology. 1997 Jan;49(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00379-2.
4
Multiple gestation pregnancy. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group.多胎妊娠。ESHRE卡普里研讨会小组。
Hum Reprod. 2000 Aug;15(8):1856-64.
5
Cost-saving treatment strategies in in vitro fertilization: a combined economic evaluation of two large randomized clinical trials comparing highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alpha.体外受精中的成本节约治疗策略:两项大型随机临床试验的联合经济评估,比较高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素和重组促卵泡激素α
Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4):1067-76. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.034. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
6
[Intrauterine insemination: state-of-the-art in humans].[宫内人工授精:人类的最新技术]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004 Oct;32(10):873-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2004.08.015.
7
Economic implications of insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization in the United States. A review.美国体外受精保险覆盖的经济影响。综述。
J Reprod Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;54(11-12):661-8.
8
Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.健康维护组织的辅助生殖技术成本。
J Reprod Med. 1997 Sep;42(9):570-4.
9
Gamete intrafallopian transfer. A cost-effective alternative to donor oocyte in vitro fertilization in women aged 40-42 years.配子输卵管内移植。40至42岁女性供体卵母细胞体外受精的一种经济有效的替代方法。
J Reprod Med. 1998 Dec;43(12):1019-22.
10
A cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization by maternal age and number of treatment attempts.按母龄和尝试治疗次数划分的体外受精的成本效益分析。
Hum Reprod. 2010 Apr;25(4):924-31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep418. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic and equity evaluation of age restrictions on over-the-counter diet pills and muscle-building supplements.非处方减肥药和增肌补充剂年龄限制的经济与公平性评估。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jan 22;3(1):qxaf002. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf002. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
A Comprehensive Review of the Endometrial Receptivity Array in Embryo Transfer: Advancements, Applications, and Clinical Outcomes.胚胎移植中子宫内膜容受性阵列的综合综述:进展、应用及临床结果
Cureus. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):e67866. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67866. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Randomized prospective study comparing conventional In Vitro Fertilization technique to Intravaginal Culture with the INVOCELL™ device for 3 and 5 days.
随机前瞻性研究比较传统的体外受精技术与 INVOCELL™ 装置 3 天和 5 天的阴道内培养。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023 Sep 12;27(3):360-366. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20220042.
4
In vitro fertilization: a cross-sectional analysis of 58 US insurance companies.体外受精:对 58 家美国保险公司的横断面分析。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Mar;40(3):581-587. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02697-5. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Reliability and validity of the PHQ-8 in first-time mothers who used assisted reproductive technology.PHQ-8在使用辅助生殖技术的初产妇中的信度和效度。
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Apr 11;2022(2):hoac019. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac019. eCollection 2022.
6
Cost-effectiveness of assisted reproductive technologies in Saudi Arabia: Comparing in vitro fertilization with intrauterine insemination.沙特阿拉伯辅助生殖技术的成本效益:体外受精与宫内人工授精的比较。
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Jun 13;8:2050312120931988. doi: 10.1177/2050312120931988. eCollection 2020.
7
Which female cancer patients fail to receive fertility counseling before treatment in the state of Georgia?在佐治亚州,哪些女性癌症患者在治疗前未接受生育咨询?
Fertil Steril. 2016 Dec;106(7):1763-1771.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.034. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
8
Economic value of in vitro fertilization in Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.乌克兰、白俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦体外受精的经济价值。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Jun 12;7:347-56. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S79513. eCollection 2015.
9
IVF cycle cost estimation using Activity Based Costing and Monte Carlo simulation.使用作业成本法和蒙特卡洛模拟对体外受精周期成本进行估算。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Mar;19(1):20-30. doi: 10.1007/s10729-014-9282-2. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
10
Utilization of infertility treatments: the effects of insurance mandates.不孕症治疗的利用:保险要求的影响。
Demography. 2012 Feb;49(1):125-49. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0078-4.