Climent C E, Plutchik R, Estrada H, Gaviria L F, Arévalo W
Am J Psychiatry. 1975 Apr;132(4):450-3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.132.4.450.
The authors compared the results of independent evaluations of 96 patients, each of whom was given a traditional psychiatric interview, resulting in a narrative report, and a structured interview based on a self-report questionnaire, resulting in a standardized report. Although the latter method produced a higher frequency of report of all symptoms, the overall accuracy of diagnoses was similar for the two methods. The authors enumerate the potential benefits of the use of standardized histories.
作者比较了对96名患者进行独立评估的结果,每位患者都接受了一次传统的精神科访谈,形成一份叙述性报告,以及一次基于自我报告问卷的结构化访谈,形成一份标准化报告。尽管后一种方法产生所有症状报告的频率更高,但两种方法诊断的总体准确性相似。作者列举了使用标准化病史的潜在益处。