Suppr超能文献

[当今感染性心内膜炎的诊断:杜克标准还是临床判断?]

[Diagnosis of endocarditis today: Duke criteria or clinical judgment?].

作者信息

Naber C K, Bartel T, Eggebrecht H, Erbel R

机构信息

Abteilung für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Herz. 2001 Sep;26(6):379-90. doi: 10.1007/pl00002042.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS: Due to the complexity of the clinical diagnosis of infective endocarditis, standardized diagnostic schemes have been developed to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis. The Von Reyn criteria, introduced in 1981 relied mainly on clinical, microbiological, and histopathological criteria and were for more than 10 years regarded as the diagnostic goldstandard. However, the Von Reyn criteria have a sensitivity of merely about 30-60% and their reliability is especially low in case of negative blood cultures.

ROLE OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

An important step towards an improved sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis was the introduction of transesophageal echocardiography, which is far more sensitive and specific in this indication than the transthoracic approach. Besides the early detection of vegetations and complications such as abscess formation, valvular destructions or perforations, echocardiography may be helpful to identify patients at risk for a prolonged healing, embolization, or may be also used to monitor the therapeutic progress.

THE DUKE CRITERIA

Implementation of echocardiography into the Duke criteria, introduced in 1994, yielded as expected, a significant higher sensitivity of up to 100% than the von Reyn criteria with an almost identical specificity. Thus, the latter were completely replaced by the Duke criteria in clinical practice.

MODIFICATIONS OF THE DUKE CRITERIA

Nevertheless, some uncertainty remains, especially in culture-negative endocarditis which has led to certain modifications of the Duke criteria. Besides the implementation of unspecific inflammatory parameters such as the C-reactive protein, a positive Q-fever serology has been added and any S. aureus bacteremia is now judged as major criterion. Although a prospective evaluation has to be awaited, these modifications appear promising and should be implemented into clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The Duke criteria are currently the most sensitive tool in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. It can be expected that they will help to significantly shorten the time to diagnosis, and may, thus, improve the clinical outcome.

摘要

未标注

感染性心内膜炎的诊断:由于感染性心内膜炎临床诊断的复杂性,已制定标准化诊断方案以提高诊断的敏感性和特异性。1981年引入的冯·雷因标准主要依赖临床、微生物学和组织病理学标准,十多年来一直被视为诊断金标准。然而,冯·雷因标准的敏感性仅约为30%-60%,在血培养阴性的情况下其可靠性尤其低。

超声心动图的作用

提高感染性心内膜炎诊断敏感性和特异性的重要一步是引入经食管超声心动图,在此适应证中,它比经胸超声心动图更敏感、更具特异性。除了早期发现赘生物和并发症,如脓肿形成、瓣膜破坏或穿孔外,超声心动图有助于识别有愈合延长、栓塞风险的患者,也可用于监测治疗进展。

杜克标准

1994年引入的杜克标准将超声心动图纳入其中,正如预期的那样,其敏感性显著提高,高达100%,高于冯·雷因标准,而特异性几乎相同。因此,在临床实践中,后者被杜克标准完全取代。

杜克标准的修订

然而,仍存在一些不确定性,尤其是在血培养阴性的心内膜炎中,这导致了杜克标准的某些修订。除了纳入非特异性炎症参数,如C反应蛋白外,还增加了Q热血清学阳性,现在任何金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症都被判定为主要标准。尽管有待进行前瞻性评估,但这些修订似乎很有前景,应在临床实践中实施。

结论

杜克标准是目前诊断感染性心内膜炎最敏感的工具。可以预期,它们将有助于显著缩短诊断时间,从而改善临床结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验