Kupferwasser L I, Bayer A S
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, St. John's Cardiovascular Research Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Herz. 2001 Sep;26(6):398-408. doi: 10.1007/s00059-001-2314-y.
Culture-negative endocarditis is a diagnostic challenge with variable clinical presentation and protean manifestations.
The two main causes why endocarditis may be culture-negative are 1. antibiotic treatment prior to obtaining blood cultures, and 2. the presence of fastidious microorganisms with limited or no capacity to grow in routine blood cultures (Table 1). If initial blood cultures remain negative for 48-72 hours, these cultures should be incubated for at least an additional 2-4 weeks. Moreover, subcultures should be plated onto chocolate agar and incubated in an atmosphere of increased CO2 environment to facilitate recovery of fastidious bacteria. Additional techniques for identification of a causative organism include serologic tests and DNA/RNA-based molecular techniques. If the patient is clinically stable, the clinician can wait until culture results from initial samples are known before deciding upon either administering an empiric antibiotic therapy or obtaining further blood cultures. Certain predisposing patient characteristics or epidemiologic exposures may be associated with particular causative microorganisms in culture-negative endocarditis. In the absence of positive blood cultures echocardiography is a crucial tool in the diagnosis and management of culture-negative endocarditis which provides the basis for the visualization of endocarditis-associated cardiac lesions. In this context, transesophageal echocardiography is associated with a significantly higher sensitivity in the detection of vegetations and perivalvular complications and is, therefore, considered the diagnostic imaging method of choice in the diagnosis of culture-negative endocarditis. The Duke criteria have been shown to have a high accuracy in the diagnosis of culture-negative endocarditis. In this context global clinical judgment demonstrated a comparable sensitivity but a lower specificity. Main differential diagnoses include diseases which can mimic the clinical endocarditis syndrome as well as the echocardiographic pattern of culture-negative endocarditis, especially 1. nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis and 2. valvular sclerosis in the presence of systemic infection (Table 2).
The selection of a particular antibiotic regimen in a suspected case of culture-negative endocarditis depends on demographics (e.g., age or geographic area), epidemiologic history (e.g., animal exposures, drug-use history, alcohol abuse, homelessness) and clinical characteristics which may be suggestive of an etiologic organism.
血培养阴性的心内膜炎是一种诊断难题,临床表现多样,症状千变万化。
心内膜炎血培养阴性的两个主要原因是:1. 在采集血培养标本之前使用了抗生素;2. 存在苛养微生物,它们在常规血培养中生长受限或无法生长(表1)。如果最初的血培养48 - 72小时仍为阴性,这些培养物应至少再培养2 - 4周。此外,应将传代培养物接种在巧克力琼脂上,并在增加二氧化碳的环境中培养,以利于苛养菌的复苏。鉴定病原体的其他技术包括血清学检测和基于DNA/RNA的分子技术。如果患者临床稳定,临床医生可以等待初始样本的培养结果出来后,再决定是给予经验性抗生素治疗还是进一步采集血培养。某些易感患者特征或流行病学暴露可能与血培养阴性的心内膜炎中的特定致病微生物有关。在血培养阴性的情况下,超声心动图是诊断和管理血培养阴性的心内膜炎的关键工具,它为可视化心内膜炎相关的心脏病变提供了依据。在这种情况下,经食管超声心动图在检测赘生物和瓣周并发症方面具有显著更高的敏感性,因此被认为是诊断血培养阴性的心内膜炎的首选诊断成像方法。杜克标准已被证明在诊断血培养阴性的心内膜炎方面具有很高的准确性。在这种情况下,整体临床判断显示出相当的敏感性,但特异性较低。主要鉴别诊断包括可模拟临床心内膜炎综合征以及血培养阴性的心内膜炎超声心动图表现的疾病,特别是1. 非细菌性血栓性心内膜炎和2. 存在全身感染时的瓣膜硬化(表2)。
在疑似血培养阴性的心内膜炎病例中,选择特定的抗生素方案取决于人口统计学特征(如年龄或地理区域)、流行病学史(如动物接触史、用药史、酗酒、无家可归)以及可能提示病原体的临床特征。