• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格罗利希和派尔图谱如今对荷兰白种儿童仍然适用吗?

Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas still valid for Dutch Caucasian children today?

作者信息

van Rijn R R, Lequin M H, Robben S G, Hop W C, van Kuijk C

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Suite D 206, University Hospital Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pediatr Radiol. 2001 Oct;31(10):748-52. doi: 10.1007/s002470100531.

DOI:10.1007/s002470100531
PMID:11685448
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In our Paediatric Radiology Department, the Greulich and Pyle technique is used to assess skeletal age. Several authors have raised questions with regard to the applicability of this technique in a contemporary paediatric and adolescent population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare skeletal age and calendar age in a healthy Dutch Caucasian population in order to test the applicability in this specific population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this study we enrolled 278 Dutch Caucasian boys (age range 5.0-19.5 years, mean 12.6 years) and 294 Dutch Caucasian girls (age range 5.2-19.9 years, mean 12.2 years). Radiographs of the left hand were scored according to the Greulich and Pyle atlas by two investigators.

RESULTS

Intra-observer coefficient of variation of duplicate assessment of skeletal age for investigator 1 (resident) was 2.4 % and for investigator 2 (radiologist) was 1.5 %. We found no significant systematic differences between the two observers regarding variability and levels of measurement, and the agreement was good. There was a strongly significant correlation between skeletal and calendar age rgirls = 0.974 and rboys = 0.979 (P < 0.001). On average, calendar age preceded skeletal age by a small amount (1.7 months in girls and 3.3 months in boys, both P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability of the Greulich and Pyle atlas in our study corresponds well with previously reported studies. Based on our data, we conclude that the Greulich and Pyle atlas is still applicable in Dutch Caucasian children and adolescents.

摘要

背景

在我们的儿科放射科,采用格-派(Greulich and Pyle)技术评估骨龄。几位作者对该技术在当代儿童和青少年人群中的适用性提出了疑问。

目的

比较健康荷兰白种人群的骨龄和实际年龄,以测试该技术在这一特定人群中的适用性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了278名荷兰白种男孩(年龄范围5.0 - 19.5岁,平均12.6岁)和294名荷兰白种女孩(年龄范围5.2 - 19.9岁,平均12.2岁)。两名研究人员根据格-派图谱对左手X线片进行评分。

结果

研究者1(住院医师)对骨龄重复评估的观察者内变异系数为2.4%,研究者2(放射科医生)为1.5%。我们发现两位观察者在变异性和测量水平方面没有显著的系统差异,一致性良好。骨龄与实际年龄之间存在高度显著的相关性,女孩r = 0.974,男孩r = 0.979(P < 0.001)。平均而言,实际年龄略先于骨龄(女孩为1.7个月,男孩为3.3个月,均P < 0.001)。

结论

我们研究中格-派图谱的可靠性与先前报道的研究结果相符。基于我们的数据,我们得出结论,格-派图谱仍适用于荷兰白种儿童和青少年。

相似文献

1
Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas still valid for Dutch Caucasian children today?格罗利希和派尔图谱如今对荷兰白种儿童仍然适用吗?
Pediatr Radiol. 2001 Oct;31(10):748-52. doi: 10.1007/s002470100531.
2
Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to black and white children of today.格罗利希和派尔骨骼年龄标准对当今黑人和白人儿童的适用性。
Am J Dis Child. 1993 Dec;147(12):1329-33. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160360071022.
3
Evaluating the agreement of skeletal age assessment based on hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae radiography.评估基于手-腕和颈椎射线摄影的骨骼年龄评估的一致性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):838-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.015.
4
Bone age determination in eutrophic, overweight and obese Brazilian children and adolescents: a comparison between computerized BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods.巴西营养良好、超重和肥胖儿童和青少年的骨龄测定:计算机 BoneXpert 法与 Greulich-Pyle 法的比较。
Pediatr Radiol. 2019 Aug;49(9):1185-1191. doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04435-z. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Accuracy of skeletal age assessment in children from birth to 6 years of age with the ultrasonographic version of the Greulich-Pyle atlas.使用超声版格-派图谱评估出生至6岁儿童骨骼年龄的准确性。
J Ultrasound Med. 2003 Jul;22(7):683-90. doi: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.7.683.
6
The applicability of Greulich and Pyle atlas to assess skeletal age for four ethnic groups.格吕利希和派尔图谱在评估四个种族群体骨骼年龄方面的适用性。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2014 Feb;22:26-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
7
Comparative study of Gilsanz-Ratib digital atlas and Greulich-Pyle atlas for bone age estimation in a Chinese sample.吉尔桑斯-拉蒂卜数字图谱与格罗利希-派尔图谱在中国样本中用于骨龄评估的比较研究。
Ann Hum Biol. 2015;42(6):523-7. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2014.977346. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
8
Applicability and robustness of an artificial intelligence-based assessment for Greulich and Pyle bone age in a German cohort.基于人工智能的格雷利希和派尔骨龄评估在德国队列中的适用性和稳健性。
Rofo. 2024 Jun;196(6):600-606. doi: 10.1055/a-2203-2997. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
9
Forensic use of the Greulich and Pyle atlas: prediction intervals and relevance.格吕利希和派尔图谱在法医学中的应用:预测区间及相关性
Eur Radiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):1032-1043. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4466-4. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Can the Greulich and Pyle method be used on French contemporary individuals?格吕利希和派尔方法能用于法国当代人吗?
Int J Legal Med. 2015 Jan;129(1):171-7. doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-1028-7. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Chronological, Greulich-Pyle, and Modified Fels Skeletal Ages in Patients with Unilateral Infantile and Adolescent Blount Diseases.单侧婴儿型和青少年型布朗特病患者的实际年龄、格鲁利希-派尔法和改良费尔斯法骨骼年龄的比较。
JB JS Open Access. 2025 Aug 15;10(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00151. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Assessing skeletal maturity in a UK modern female population.评估英国现代女性群体的骨骼成熟度。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s12024-025-01044-1.
3
The Validation of the Greulich and Pyle Atlas for Radiological Bone Age Assessments in a Pediatric Population from the Canary Islands.
加那利群岛儿科人群中用于放射学骨龄评估的格鲁利希和派尔图谱的验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;12(18):1847. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12181847.
4
A probability model for estimating age in young individuals relative to key legal thresholds: 15, 18 or 21-year.一种用于估计年轻人相对于关键法定年龄界限(15岁、18岁或21岁)的年龄的概率模型。
Int J Legal Med. 2025 Jan;139(1):197-217. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03324-x. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
5
Precision and Accuracy of Radiological Bone Age Assessment in Children among Different Ethnic Groups: A Systematic Review.不同种族儿童放射学骨龄评估的准确性和精确性:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 4;13(19):3124. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193124.
6
Texture Analysis for the Bone Age Assessment from MRI Images of Adolescent Wrists in Boys.基于男孩青少年手腕MRI图像的骨龄评估纹理分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 7;12(8):2762. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082762.
7
Greulich and Pyle atlas: a non-reliable skeletal maturity assessment method in the North Indian population.格罗利希和派尔图谱:印度北部人群中一种不可靠的骨骼成熟度评估方法。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Mar;20(1):106-116. doi: 10.1007/s12024-023-00607-4. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
8
The Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Skeletal Age Assessment.磁共振成像在骨龄评估中的应用。
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Feb 21;2022:9607237. doi: 10.1155/2022/9607237. eCollection 2022.
9
Reproducibility and reliability analysis of the Luk Distal Radius and Ulna Classification for European patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.针对欧洲青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的Luk桡骨远端和尺骨分类的可重复性和可靠性分析。
J Child Orthop. 2021 Apr 19;15(2):166-170. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200251.
10
Bone of contention: The applicability of the Greulich-Pyle method for skeletal age assessment in South Africa.争议焦点:格吕利希-派尔方法在南非骨骼年龄评估中的适用性。
SA J Radiol. 2018 Aug 8;22(1):1348. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v22i1.1348. eCollection 2018.