Debien C, De Chouly De Lenclave M B, Foutrein P, Bailly D
Service de Psychiatrie Adulte, CHRU de Lille, 6, rue du Professeur Laguesse, 59037 Lille.
Encephale. 2001 Jul-Aug;27(4):308-17.
The interferon alpha stands as a reference both in oncology and virology. But its efficiency is limited by frequent somatic as well as neuropsychic side effects. As a matter of fact, the reduction or the ending of a chemotherapy treatment come chiefly from the psychiatric complications caused by the use of interferon. For about 30% of patients, various psychic disorders are noticed: personality disorders, mood disorders, anxiety states, suicidal tendencies, manic and psychotic symptoms. We thus propose a review which shall be completed by a discussion on wether the interferon is responsible or not of the appearance of the described mental disorders. We shall conclude with a synthesis of the proposed practical management when confronted with such disorders. Psychiatric complications under interferon-Alpha. The appearance of psychiatric complications caused by interferon has been the subject of many publications. They have also raised the question of the toxicity mechanism which is still misunderstood today. This toxicity appears to be dose-dependent with variations depending on the daily dose given, the mode of administration, the combination with other chemotherapy treatments, the concomitance with a cerebral radiotherapy or a medical history of psychiatric disorders. Most of these effects occur after three weeks of treatment but non specific neuropsychic symptoms can be observed earlier. Non specific symptoms. They appear early but are difficult to detect, though they bring together a whole lot of clinical signs: asthenia, irritability, psychomotor slowdown, depressive mood or even a real "subsyndromic" depressive syndrome, anorexia, decline of the libido, concentration and attention problems, dizzy spells and headaches. Some authors have described intense and fluctuating of personality, mixing anxiety, irritability and disorder of drive control. Depression. Depression is the most frequently found psychiatric pathology in studies but the real frequency of clear cases of depressive problems is difficult to determine through lack of serious studies. So the incidence of depressive disorders usually varies from 5 to 15%. The depressive syndrome can settle as soon as the first week treatment, with a peak in the frequency during the first and third months. The seriousness and the incidence of this syndrome seem to be dose-dependent. The gravity of this complication lies in the suicidal risk, a risk all the more dreadful since there is not any identified risk factor. Suicides and suicidal behaviours. Serious complications, because they act directly on the vital prognosis. However fortunately, suicidal behaviours only represent a minority within all the side effects attributed to the interferon-alpha. These actions fit into three main clinical dimensions: complication of a severe depressive syndrome, confusional context and disorder of the impulses control. In practical terms, prevention proves to be difficult without identified predictive factors. Nevertheless, some authors point out the importance of aggravating comorbid disorders like alcoholism or the coinfection by the HIV. Manic syndrome. The appearance of a manic state under a chemotherapy treatment seems to be rare, given that there have been only a dozen cases published around the world. But these observations are interesting as far as both the study of imputability and the understanding of the toxicity mechanisms are concerned. Most of the cases deal with patients without a family or personal history of psychiatric disorders, and whose symptomatology disappears with the end of the treatment, which is an argument in favour of the imputation of the interferon in the appearance of manic disorders. In addition, some authors introduce the notion of tertiary mania: the appearance of an autoimmune hypothyroidism in relation with interferon and leading to athymic elation. Eventually, the appearance of manic problems at the end of the treatment makes it possible to speculate about the physiopathological mechanisms that are at issue. Anxiety disorders. These disorders are not much described: they generally are already existing disorders (like phobic or obsessive compulsive disorders), reactivated or aggravated by the interferon-alpha molecule. Adaptation disorders. It deals with adaptation disorders along with anxious temper coming at the beginning of the treatment. These problems are more concerned with the announcement of the diagnosis and its seriousness than with the toxicity of the interferon-alpha molecule. Psychotic states. There are less papers on the prevalence of psychotic disorders during the treatment, or at the end of it. But they can be found in both viral and malignant pathologies. A large retrospective study has shown ten cases of psychotic disorders and that in the absence of history of psychiatry or of a HIV co-infection. In every case the psychiatric aspect is stopped by the ending of the treatment or by an appropriated treatment. Usually, the few cases of paranoïd delusion described in papers seem to appear between one and three months of treatment, with patients having a history of psychiatric disorders. Aggravation of pre-existing mental disorders. Numerous authors have reported the recurrence of addictive behaviours (alcohol or other psychoactive matter) by weaned patients. Imputability to interferon-alpha in psychiatric disorders. It is difficult to draw the relationship between the chemotherapy with the interferon-alpha treatment and neuropsychiatric complications because there is a lack in specific studies. Nevertheless, it seems to be causal relations between the prescription of interferon and the appearance of psychic disorders. As a matter of fact, even if there is neither predictive criterion nor diagnosis of clinical type (set apart a dose effect), it is clear that there are diagnostic criteria of chronological kind: delay of appearance and disappearance of side effects compatible with the kinetics of the molecule and test of positive reintroduction. The imputability is thus most likely towards, given the reported clinical observations and signs of direct cerebral toxicity described for interferon: induction of neurophysiological changes among healthy volunteers, reversible EEG impairments the second week of treatment, direct vascular and neurological toxicity. Eventually, authors have shown that the psychiatric morbidity could be more important among patients under treatment than in a control group. In conclusion, the imputability of interferon appears to be very likely, more particularly in the appearance of mood disorders, mainly depressive ones, of manic syndromes and of certain psychotic episodes.
The most numerous therapeutic propositions naturally concern the depressive syndromes, because of their high frequency. In a recent article, the authors have detailed the pharmacological criteria of the ideal molecule: limited hepatic metabolism, low rate of proteinic fixation, long half-life and absence of active metabolite. So they advise not to prescribe imipraminic molecules and recommend the use of some SRI in first intention: citalopram and sertraline mainly, paroxetine to avoid given its pharmacological features that do not seem adapted. Only the minalcipram seems to show all the theoretical advantages described above. If there is an indication in the introduction of an anxiolytic medication, we shall prefer a benzodiazepine with short half-life like loxazepam and alprazolam. Besides, all the publications point out the importance of a specific clinical observation during the treatment as well as in the six months following its end. The agreement must bear full medical costs, above all including psychotherapic and social aspects. The proposed treatments for the other disorders are conventional: haloperidol and lithium for bipolar disorders, fluvoxamine for obsessive compulsive disorders and neuroleptics for psychotic disorders.
The appearance of neuropsychiatric side effects during a chemotherapy using the interferon-alpha molecule is a frequent complication, the consequences of which can prove tragic: involvement of the vital prognosis, family and professional relation disturbances, compliance problems, risks of psychiatric morbidity at short and middle terms.... In spite of the absence of rigorous controlled studies, the imputability to the interferon of the appearance of psychological disorders appears very likely. So the role of the psychiatrist seems to be determining in the follow-up care of these patients who must be considered at high risk to develop a psychiatric pathology. The agreement to bear medical costs has to be made in narrow collaboration with clinical practitioners and must be part of a clinical continuity, from the pre-therapeutical evaluation to the remote follow-up care. Finally, it seems important to implement controlled studies, resting on a great diagnostic and methodological rigour, in order to clarify the toxicity mechanisms of interferon and to optimise the agreement to bear medical cost for the patients.
干扰素α在肿瘤学和病毒学领域都是一种参考药物。但其疗效受到频繁出现的躯体及神经精神方面副作用的限制。事实上,化疗治疗的减少或终止主要源于使用干扰素所引发的精神并发症。约30%的患者会出现各种精神障碍:人格障碍、情绪障碍、焦虑状态、自杀倾向、躁狂和精神病性症状。因此,我们提议进行一次综述,并通过讨论干扰素是否导致所描述的精神障碍的出现来加以完善。我们将以面对此类障碍时所提议的实际管理方法的综合阐述作为结论。α干扰素引发的精神并发症。干扰素引发的精神并发症一直是众多出版物的主题。它们也引发了毒性机制的问题,而这一机制至今仍未被完全理解。这种毒性似乎具有剂量依赖性,其变化取决于每日给药剂量、给药方式、与其他化疗治疗的联合使用、是否同时进行脑部放疗或患者的精神疾病病史。这些影响大多在治疗三周后出现,但非特异性神经精神症状可能更早被观察到。非特异性症状。它们出现较早但难以察觉,尽管它们包含许多临床体征:乏力、易怒、精神运动迟缓、抑郁情绪甚至是真正的“亚综合征”抑郁综合征、厌食、性欲减退、注意力不集中和注意力障碍、头晕和头痛。一些作者描述了人格的强烈波动,混合着焦虑、易怒和冲动控制障碍。抑郁症。抑郁症是研究中最常发现的精神病理状况,但由于缺乏严谨的研究,很难确定明确的抑郁问题的实际发生率。因此,抑郁障碍的发生率通常在5%至15%之间。抑郁综合征可能在治疗的第一周就出现,在第一个月和第三个月频率达到峰值。该综合征的严重程度和发生率似乎具有剂量依赖性。这种并发症的严重性在于自杀风险,由于没有任何已确定的风险因素,这一风险更加可怕。自杀和自杀行为。严重的并发症,因为它们直接影响生命预后。然而幸运的是,自杀行为在所有归因于α干扰素的副作用中只占少数。这些行为主要体现在三个临床方面:严重抑郁综合征的并发症、意识模糊状态和冲动控制障碍。实际上,在没有明确的预测因素的情况下,预防很困难。然而,一些作者指出了加重合并症如酗酒或HIV合并感染的重要性。躁狂综合征。在化疗治疗期间出现躁狂状态似乎很罕见,因为全世界仅发表了十几例相关病例。但就病因研究和毒性机制的理解而言,这些观察结果很有意思。大多数病例涉及没有精神疾病家族史或个人史的患者,其症状在治疗结束后消失,这支持了将躁狂障碍的出现归因于干扰素的观点。此外,一些作者引入了三级躁狂的概念:与干扰素相关的自身免疫性甲状腺功能减退导致的无胸腺欣快。最终,治疗结束时出现躁狂问题使得人们可以推测其中涉及的生理病理机制。焦虑障碍。这些障碍描述较少:它们通常是已有的疾病(如恐惧症或强迫症),因α干扰素分子而复发或加重。适应障碍。它涉及治疗开始时出现的伴有焦虑情绪的适应障碍。这些问题更多地与诊断的告知及其严重性有关,而非α干扰素分子的毒性。精神病状态。关于治疗期间或治疗结束时精神病性障碍的患病率的论文较少。但它们在病毒和恶性疾病中都可能出现。一项大型回顾性研究显示了10例精神病性障碍病例,且这些病例没有精神病史或HIV合并感染。在每种情况下,精神方面的问题通过治疗结束或适当的治疗得以缓解。通常,论文中描述的少数偏执妄想病例似乎在治疗的一至三个月出现,患者有精神疾病病史。原有精神障碍的加重。许多作者报告了戒毒患者成瘾行为(酒精或其他精神活性物质)的复发。精神障碍中α干扰素的病因归因。由于缺乏具体研究,很难确定α干扰素化疗与神经精神并发症之间的关系。然而,干扰素的处方与精神障碍的出现之间似乎存在因果关系。事实上,即使既没有预测标准也没有临床类型的诊断(除了剂量效应),但很明显存在时间顺序上的诊断标准:副作用出现和消失的延迟与分子动力学以及阳性再引入试验相符合。因此,根据所报道的临床观察和针对干扰素描述的直接脑毒性迹象:健康志愿者中神经生理变化的诱导、治疗第二周可逆的脑电图损害、直接的血管和神经毒性,病因归因很可能指向干扰素。最终,作者表明接受治疗的患者中的精神疾病发病率可能比对照组更高。总之,干扰素的病因归因似乎很有可能,特别是在情绪障碍的出现方面,主要是抑郁性的,以及躁狂综合征和某些精神病性发作方面。
由于抑郁综合征的高发性,最多的治疗建议自然涉及到它。在最近的一篇文章中,作者详细阐述了理想分子的药理学标准:肝脏代谢有限、蛋白质结合率低、半衰期长且无活性代谢产物。因此,他们建议不要开三环类抗抑郁药分子,并首先推荐使用一些选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SRI):主要是西酞普兰和舍曲林,鉴于其药理学特性似乎不适用,应避免使用帕罗西汀。只有米那普明似乎显示出上述所有理论优势。如果有使用抗焦虑药物的指征,我们更倾向于使用半衰期短的苯二氮䓬类药物,如氯羟安定和阿普唑仑。此外,所有出版物都指出了治疗期间以及治疗结束后六个月进行特定临床观察的重要性。协议必须承担全部医疗费用,尤其包括心理治疗和社会方面的费用。针对其他障碍的提议治疗方法是常规的:双相情感障碍使用氟哌啶醇和锂盐,强迫症使用氟伏沙明,精神病性障碍使用抗精神病药物。
在使用α干扰素分子的化疗过程中出现神经精神副作用是一种常见并发症,其后果可能很悲惨:影响生命预后、扰乱家庭和职业关系、出现依从性问题、短期内和中期有精神疾病发病风险……尽管缺乏严格的对照研究,但心理障碍的出现归因于干扰素似乎很有可能。因此,精神科医生在这些患者的后续护理中似乎起着决定性作用,这些患者必须被视为有很高的精神疾病发病风险。承担医疗费用的协议必须与临床医生密切合作达成,并且必须是临床连续性的一部分,从治疗前评估到远程后续护理。最后,开展基于严格诊断和方法严谨性的对照研究似乎很重要,以便阐明干扰素的毒性机制并优化为患者承担医疗费用的协议。