Lang J-Ph, Meyer N, Doffoel M
Praticien Hospitalier, Service de Psychiatrie du Docteur Legal M. Epsan, 67720 Hoerdt.
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):362-5.
Hepatitis C represents a major public health challenge due to its chronic evolution and major complications (eg liver tumor and cirrhosis). New treatment strategies (interferon pégylé +/- ribavirine) have recently improved the prognosis except in case of poor compliance. Psychiatric comorbidity, especially affective disorders, is commonly associated with hepatitis C and constitutes the main cause of poor compliance, therapeutic discontinuations and treatment contra-indication. At this moment of new therapeutic protocols and the possibility of curing HCV infections, it is of utmost importance to widen antiviral treatment in many indications, to upgrade compliance, and to limit therapeutic discontinuations. In this context, where anxious and depressive disorders are the main reasons for failure in curing, it is necessary to anticipate the appearance of these troubles within an earlier multidisciplinary taking in charge. The primary aim of our study is to emphasize the utility of a multi-disciplinary approach including psychiatric evaluation, preventive follow-up and preventive treatment. The secondary objective is to show that a previous story of depression or use of drugs should not be considered as an insuperable contra-indication provoding the implementation of a specific follow-up. Thirty nine interferon treated patients were included in a prospective study. Our data confirm the high rate (28%) of Major Depressive Disorders among the population of hepatitis C treated patients in a preventive follow-up. A previous story of alcoholism, of suicide attempt or break off treatment with Major Depressive disorders might be predictive of such a complication. According to the subjective feeling of these patients with previous break'off treatment associated, specific psychiatric follow-up may improve tolerance for the treatment.
39 patients (17 men and 22 women) accepted, on (or after) the non-systematic proposal of their hepatologist, to consult the psychiatrist of the network, prior to any therapeutic decision. The first objectives of the consultations were to inform the patient (and, with his agreement, his -relatives), about the risk of depressive disorders while under treatment by interferon, as well as their potential consequences. Moreover, the psychiatrist answers their questions concerning this issue, and proposes him a long-term psychotherapeutic follow up (up to several months after the antiviral treatment end) including availability in emergency if necessary and preventive antidepressive treatment. In this framework, we assessed in a prospective way the frequency, the intensity and the time (or moments) when major depressive episode (MDE) (according to the DSM IV) appeared under interferon alpha, the predictive factors for these MDE, the interest and the quality of a preventive antidepressive treatment prescription and the psycho-social benefits of this taking in charge for the patient.
Among these 39 patients -regularly followed during and after the antiviral therapy, 11 (28%) had a MDE while under treatment. These MDE, except for 2 (5%) of them which led to an hospitalization, were mild to moderate. They mainly appeared within the 2 first quarters of treatment without significant difference. Patients with antecedents of suicide attempt (80%), drug addiction (50%) or alcohol addiction (50%) are more likely to have a MDE under interferon alpha than other patients, but these risk factors are not a contra-indication for treatment because 95% of the patients ended their treatment and the 2 antiviral treatment discontinuations observed were secon-dary to (or following) an acute psychotic episode (hospitalization) and a maniac episode in a schizophrenic patient (outpatient care). The existence of antecedents of antiviral treatment discontinuations due to MDE (33%) does not seem to be a risk factor anymore when preventive care is provided. It is interesting to point out the existence of a certain male fragility, men are more psychologically sensitive to interferon alpha than women. About 90% of patients chose to take an antidepressant. The latter was mainly a treatment with sertraline (45% out of cases), with citalopram (40% out of cases), and for 15% of them antidepressive treatment previously prescribed and non modified because they were well-tolerated and efficient. 86% of the first prescriptions were not changed during the follow up. 75% of patients already treated by a previous antiviral treatment with interferon alpha estimated that an earlier psychiatric accompaniment was very beneficial for them, in terms of compliance and socio-professional insertion.
A specialized psychiatric accompaniment within a coherent multidisciplinary network provides a major benefit to the patients in terms of compliance and safe care (even for population considered as having higher risks) although it is not possible to define accurately the influence of the preventive prescription of a antidepressant (which is not prejudicial anyway). a previous story of depressive disorder should not be considered as a contra-indication, but should imply a specific psychiatric follow-up especially when alcoholism, previous story of suicidal attempt and previous break'off treatment are reported.
丙型肝炎因其慢性进展和主要并发症(如肝癌和肝硬化)成为一项重大的公共卫生挑战。新的治疗策略(聚乙二醇干扰素±利巴韦林)近来改善了预后,但依从性差的情况除外。精神共病,尤其是情感障碍,常与丙型肝炎相关,是依从性差、治疗中断及治疗禁忌的主要原因。在新的治疗方案以及治愈丙型肝炎感染可能性出现之际,在多种适应症中扩大抗病毒治疗、提高依从性并减少治疗中断极为重要。在此背景下,焦虑和抑郁障碍是治愈失败的主要原因,有必要在早期多学科治疗中预见这些问题的出现。我们研究的主要目的是强调包括精神评估、预防性随访及预防性治疗的多学科方法的效用。次要目标是表明抑郁病史或药物使用史不应被视为不可逾越的禁忌证,前提是实施特定的随访。三十九名接受干扰素治疗的患者纳入一项前瞻性研究。我们的数据证实,在预防性随访中,丙型肝炎治疗患者群体中重度抑郁症的发生率较高(28%)。酗酒、自杀未遂或因重度抑郁症中断治疗的既往史可能是此类并发症的预测因素。根据这些有既往治疗中断情况患者的主观感受,特定的精神科随访可能提高对治疗的耐受性。
39名患者(17名男性和22名女性)在其肝病专家非系统性建议下(或之后),在做出任何治疗决定前咨询了网络中的精神科医生。咨询的首要目标是告知患者(并在其同意下告知其亲属)干扰素治疗期间抑郁障碍的风险及其潜在后果。此外,精神科医生回答他们关于此问题的疑问,并为其提供长期心理治疗随访(直至抗病毒治疗结束后数月),包括必要时的紧急救助及预防性抗抑郁治疗。在此框架下,我们前瞻性评估了在干扰素α治疗下重度抑郁发作(根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版)出现的频率、强度及时间(或时段)、这些重度抑郁发作的预测因素、预防性抗抑郁治疗处方的益处及质量以及这种治疗对患者的心理社会益处。
在这39名在抗病毒治疗期间及之后接受定期随访的患者中,11名(28%)在治疗期间出现了重度抑郁发作。这些重度抑郁发作,除2名(5%)导致住院外,均为轻度至中度。它们主要出现在治疗的前两个季度内,无显著差异。有自杀未遂史(80%)、药物成瘾史(50%)或酒精成瘾史(50%)的患者在干扰素α治疗下比其他患者更易出现重度抑郁发作,但这些风险因素并非治疗禁忌证,因为95%的患者完成了治疗,观察到的2例抗病毒治疗中断分别继发于(或在)一名急性精神病发作(住院)患者及一名精神分裂症患者的躁狂发作(门诊治疗)之后。因重度抑郁发作导致抗病毒治疗中断的既往史(33%)在提供预防性护理时似乎不再是风险因素。值得指出的是存在一定的男性脆弱性,男性对干扰素α的心理敏感性高于女性。约90%的患者选择服用抗抑郁药。抗抑郁药主要是舍曲林治疗(占病例的45%)、西酞普兰治疗(占病例的40%),15%的患者因之前开具的抗抑郁治疗耐受性良好且有效而未改变。86%的首次处方在随访期间未改变。75%曾接受过干扰素α抗病毒治疗的患者估计,早期精神科陪伴在依从性及社会职业融入方面对他们非常有益。
在一个连贯的多学科网络内进行专门的精神科陪伴,在依从性及安全护理方面(即使对于被认为风险较高的人群)为患者带来了重大益处,尽管无法准确界定预防性抗抑郁药处方的影响(无论如何其并无损害)。抑郁障碍既往史不应被视为禁忌证,但应意味着进行特定的精神科随访,尤其是在报告有酗酒、自杀未遂既往史及既往治疗中断情况时。