Suppr超能文献

手动牙刷和电动牙刷的功效(一)。对临床参数的影响。

Efficacy of manual and powered toothbrushes (I). Effect on clinical parameters.

作者信息

Haffajee A D, Thompson M, Torresyap G, Guerrero D, Socransky S S

机构信息

Department of Periodontology,The Forsyth Institute, 140 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115-3799, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Oct;28(10):937-46. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028010937.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of the present investigation was to compare manual (Crest Complete) and powered toothbrushing (Braun Oral-B 3D Plaque Remover) for their ability to affect clinical parameters of periodontal diseases.

METHODS

48 periodontal maintenance subjects completed this single-blind 6-month longitudinal study. Subjects had a minimum of 20 natural teeth excluding third molars and >10% of sites (approximately 17 sites) with pocket depth > or =4 mm and/or >10% sites with attachment level >4 mm. At baseline, subjects received full mouth clinical measurements (168 sites) to determine mean Plaque Index, Gingival Index, pocket depth and attachment level and % of sites exhibiting BOP. Subjects were then randomly assigned to one of two groups. The control group (N=26) used a manual toothbrush while the test group (N=22) used a powered toothbrush. Subjects received instruction in oral hygiene and used their assigned toothbrush twice daily according to instruction. Follow-up clinical assessments were performed at 3 and 6 months. Significance of differences in clinical measures over time was determined using the Quade test and between brushing groups at each time point using the Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Mean pocket depth, mean plaque index and % of sites exhibiting BOP showed significant reductions from baseline to 3 and 6 months in both groups. Mean probing attachment level and mean Gingival Index were significantly reduced in the powered brushing group only. There was a significant positive correlation between plaque reduction and reduction in other clinical parameters in both brushing groups. The majority of subjects showed improvements in clinical parameters at 6 months, although a greater proportion of subjects in the powered group showed a reduction in Plaque Index (77% versus 65%) and in % sites exhibiting BOP (82% versus 69%). Mean pocket depth and mean attachment level showed significantly greater reductions between baseline and 6 months in lingual and mandibular areas in the powered group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both manual and powered toothbrushes reduced pocket depth, plaque index and BOP. The powered toothbrush significantly reduced mean gingival index and probing attachment level. The greatest benefit of the powered brush was at mandibular and lingual surfaces.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在比较手动牙刷(佳洁士全效)和电动牙刷(博朗欧乐B 3D牙菌斑清除器)对牙周疾病临床参数的影响。

方法

48名牙周维护期受试者完成了这项为期6个月的单盲纵向研究。受试者至少有20颗天然牙(不包括第三磨牙),且有超过10%的位点(约17个位点)牙周袋深度≥4mm和/或超过10%的位点附着丧失>4mm。在基线时,对受试者进行全口临床测量(168个位点),以确定平均菌斑指数、牙龈指数、牙周袋深度、附着丧失以及出现探诊出血位点的百分比。然后将受试者随机分为两组。对照组(N = 26)使用手动牙刷,试验组(N = 22)使用电动牙刷。受试者接受口腔卫生指导,并按照指导每天使用指定牙刷刷牙两次。在3个月和6个月时进行随访临床评估。使用Quade检验确定临床测量随时间变化的差异显著性,使用Mann-Whitney检验确定每个时间点两组刷牙方式之间的差异显著性。

结果

两组从基线到3个月和6个月时,平均牙周袋深度、平均菌斑指数以及出现探诊出血位点的百分比均显著降低。仅电动刷牙组的平均探诊附着丧失和平均牙龈指数显著降低。两组刷牙方式中,菌斑减少与其他临床参数的减少之间均存在显著正相关。大多数受试者在6个月时临床参数有所改善,尽管电动组中更大比例的受试者菌斑指数降低(77%对65%)以及出现探诊出血位点的百分比降低(82%对69%)。电动组在基线到6个月期间,舌侧和下颌区域的平均牙周袋深度和平均附着丧失降低更为显著。

结论

手动牙刷和电动牙刷均能降低牙周袋深度、菌斑指数和探诊出血。电动牙刷能显著降低平均牙龈指数和探诊附着丧失。电动牙刷的最大益处在于下颌和舌侧表面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验