• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手动牙刷与声波电动牙刷对牙种植体患者牙菌斑减少效果的比较:一项解释性随机对照试验。

Manual versus sonic-powered toothbrushing for plaque reduction in patients with dental implants: an explanatory randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Swierkot Katrin, Brusius Manuel, Leismann Diana, Nonnenmacher Claudia, Nüsing Rolf, Lubbe Dirk, Schade-Brittinger Carmen, Mengel Reiner

机构信息

Dental School of Medicine, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Philipps-University, Marburg/Lahn. Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Summer;6(2):133-44.

PMID:23926585
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate plaque levels following sonic-powered and manual toothbrushing in subjects with dental implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 36 male and 47 female partially edentulous patients (age range 45-78 years, mean age 59.8 years) that were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: the sonic toothbrush group (n = 42; Philips Sonicare FlexCare® toothbrush) or the manual toothbrush group (n = 41; Oral-B P40®). Clinical, microbiological and immunological examinations were performed blinded at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Microbiological analyses were performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Immunological analyses (prostaglandin E2) were performed by chromatography-electrospray spectrometry.

RESULTS

The plaque index difference between baseline and 12 months at implants showed no significant difference between sonic or manual toothbrushing in a two-sided Mann-Whitney test (W = 773.5, P = 0.426, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.20). At the end of the study, there were no significant changes in plaque index, bleeding on probing, gingival index, pocket probing depth, gingival recession, clinical attachment level or the microbiological and immunological outcomes at implants or teeth in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study uncovered no significant difference between sonic and manual toothbrushing for plaque reduction at implants and teeth. Both toothbrushes maintain healthy peri-implant soft tissue.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查牙种植体患者使用声波牙刷和手动牙刷后的牙菌斑水平。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了36名男性和47名女性部分牙列缺损患者(年龄范围45 - 78岁,平均年龄59.8岁),他们被随机分配到两个治疗组之一:声波牙刷组(n = 42;飞利浦Sonicare FlexCare®牙刷)或手动牙刷组(n = 41;欧乐B P40®)。在基线以及3、6、9和12个月后进行了盲法临床、微生物学和免疫学检查。微生物学分析通过实时聚合酶链反应进行。免疫学分析(前列腺素E2)通过色谱 - 电喷雾光谱法进行。

结果

在双侧曼 - 惠特尼检验中,种植体处基线与12个月时的牙菌斑指数差异在声波牙刷和手动牙刷之间无显著差异(W = 773.5,P = 0.426,95% CI -0.64至0.20)。在研究结束时,两组中种植体或牙齿处的牙菌斑指数、探诊出血、牙龈指数、牙周袋探诊深度、牙龈退缩、临床附着水平以及微生物学和免疫学结果均无显著变化。

结论

本研究发现声波牙刷和手动牙刷在减少种植体和牙齿上的牙菌斑方面无显著差异。两种牙刷均能维持健康的种植体周围软组织。

相似文献

1
Manual versus sonic-powered toothbrushing for plaque reduction in patients with dental implants: an explanatory randomised controlled trial.手动牙刷与声波电动牙刷对牙种植体患者牙菌斑减少效果的比较:一项解释性随机对照试验。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Summer;6(2):133-44.
2
Effectiveness of a sonic toothbrush in maintenance of dental implants. A prospective study.声波牙刷对牙种植体维护的有效性:一项前瞻性研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Oct;25(10):821-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02376.x.
3
The impact of powered and manual toothbrushing on incipient gingival recession.电动牙刷和手动牙刷对早期牙龈退缩的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Nov;36(11):950-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01472.x. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
4
An Evaluation of Plaque and Gingivitis Reduction Following Home Use of Sonicare FlexCare Platinum with Premium Plaque Control Brush Head and a Manual Toothbrush.家用飞利浦声波震动牙刷FlexCare Platinum搭配专业防蛀刷头与手动牙刷后牙菌斑与牙龈炎减少情况的评估
J Clin Dent. 2017 Mar;28(1 Spec No A):A7-12.
5
Effectiveness of the Sonicare sonic toothbrush on reduction of plaque, gingivitis, probing pocket depth and subgingival bacteria in adolescent orthodontic patients.声波震动牙刷对减少青少年正畸患者牙菌斑、牙龈炎、牙周袋深度及龈下细菌的有效性。
J Clin Dent. 1997;8(1 Spec No):15-9.
6
Efficacy of manual and powered toothbrushes (I). Effect on clinical parameters.手动牙刷和电动牙刷的功效(一)。对临床参数的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Oct;28(10):937-46. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028010937.x.
7
A clinical study comparing the supragingival plaque and gingivitis efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to a commercially available manual flat-trim toothbrush.一项临床研究,比较一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与市售手动平切牙刷在龈上菌斑和牙龈炎治疗效果方面的差异。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A11-6.
8
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.
9
A Thirty-Day Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Rowenta, Braun and Sonicare Powered Toothbrushes and a Manual Toothbrush.Rowenta、博朗和飞利浦声波震动牙刷与手动牙刷的30天安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Dent. 1997;8(4):120-3.
10
Comparison of the Hydrabrush powered toothbrush with two commercially-available powered toothbrushes.Hydrabrush电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷的比较。
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2005 Jul;7(3):80-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Maintenance of peri-implant health in general dental practice.一般牙科实践中的种植体周围健康维护。
Br Dent J. 2024 May;236(10):781-789. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7406-8. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
Angled implant brush for hygienic maintenance of full-arch fixed-implant rehabilitations: a pilot study.用于全牙弓固定种植修复体卫生维护的成角种植体刷:一项初步研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020 Oct;50(5):340-354. doi: 10.5051/jpis.1905320266.
3
Brushing associated with oral irrigation in maintaining implants and overdentures hygiene - a randomized clinical trial.
刷牙联合口腔冲洗在维持种植体和覆盖义齿卫生中的效果-一项随机临床试验。
Odontology. 2021 Jan;109(1):284-294. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00543-7. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Efficacy of electric-powered cleaning instruments in edentulous patients with implant-supported full-arch fixed prostheses: a crossover design.电动清洁器械在种植体支持的全牙弓固定修复无牙颌患者中的疗效:一项交叉设计研究
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Mar 26;5(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0164-8.
5
Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial.振荡旋转式牙刷在牙种植体患者中的有效性和依从性:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Dec 10;4(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0150-6.
6
Non-Surgical Therapy for Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review.种植体周围疾病的非手术治疗:一项系统综述
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016 Sep 9;7(3):e13. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2016.7313. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
7
Microbial Profiles and Detection Techniques in Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review.种植体周围疾病中的微生物概况与检测技术:一项系统综述
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016 Sep 9;7(3):e10. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2016.7310. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
8
Efficacy of sonic-powered toothbrushes for plaque removal in patients with peri-implant mucositis.声波电动牙刷对种植体周围黏膜炎患者牙菌斑清除的疗效。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015 Apr;45(2):56-61. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.2.56. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
9
Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.电动牙刷与手动牙刷对口腔健康的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD002281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3.