Suppr超能文献

肌生成素和肌分化抗原1(MyoD1)的表达对横纹肌肉瘤具有特异性吗?一项对150例病例的研究,重点关注梭形细胞模仿物。

Are myogenin and myoD1 expression specific for rhabdomyosarcoma? A study of 150 cases, with emphasis on spindle cell mimics.

作者信息

Cessna M H, Zhou H, Perkins S L, Tripp S R, Layfield L, Daines C, Coffin C M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg Pathol. 2001 Sep;25(9):1150-7. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200109000-00005.

Abstract

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood, displays a variety of histologic patterns. Immunohistochemistry is used extensively to distinguish RMS from its mimics. Myogenin and MyoD1, myogenic transcriptional regulatory proteins expressed early in skeletal muscle differentiation, are considered sensitive and specific markers for RMS and are more specific than desmin and muscle-specific actin and more sensitive than myoglobin. Previous studies have focused on expression of myogenin and MyoD1 in small round cell tumors. This study assesses myogenin and MyoD1 in rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes and spindle cell tumors considered in the differential diagnosis of RMS. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissue from 32 RMS, 107 non-RMS, and 11 benign skeletal muscle samples was stained for myogenin and MyoD1 with standard immunohistochemical techniques. Nuclear positivity was scored on a three-tiered scale. All RMSs expressed myogenin. Alveolar RMS (ARMS) showed strong nuclear staining, especially in tumor cells lining fibrous septae and perivascular regions. In cases with a subtle alveolar architecture on routinely stained sections, myogenin highlighted and enhanced visualization of the alveolar morphologic pattern. Embryonal RMSs (ERMSs) were more variable in myogenin staining pattern and intensity. No cases of nodular fasciitis, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, myofibrosarcoma, leiomyoma, leiomyosarcoma, or alveolar soft part sarcoma stained for myogenin. Focal nuclear reactivity was seen in desmoid (2 of 10), infantile myofibromatosis (2 of 10), synovial sarcoma (1 of 10), and infantile fibrosarcoma (2 of 10). Non-neoplastic skeletal muscle fiber nuclei stained positively for myogenin in both tumor-associated samples (25 of 40) and benign skeletal muscle samples (5 of 11). Although all RMSs were immunoreactive for MyoD1, cytoplasmic and nonspecific background staining and reactivity of nonmyoid tissues hindered its practical utility in paraffin-embedded samples in this study. Although myogenin is a highly sensitive and specific marker for RMS, it is rarely seen in other spindle cell soft tissue tumors. As previously reported, ARMS stained more strongly than ERMS. In contrast to previous studies, rare non-RMS (7 of 107) displayed focal nuclear reactivity, and entrapped atrophic or regenerative skeletal muscle fibers also stained positively. Although these are potential pitfalls in the interpretation of myogenin, careful attention to morphology and other features, to the relative paucity of myogenin-positive nuclei in non-RMS. and to the presence of entrapped muscle fibers should prevent incorrect interpretation. Because the extent of myogenin expression in RMS is much greater than in non-RMS, it is a very useful marker when interpreted in the context of other clinicopathologic data.

摘要

横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)是儿童最常见的软组织肉瘤,具有多种组织学模式。免疫组织化学被广泛用于将RMS与其相似病变相鉴别。生肌调节因子和肌分化抗原1(MyoD1)是在骨骼肌分化早期表达的生肌转录调节蛋白,被认为是RMS敏感且特异的标志物,比结蛋白和肌肉特异性肌动蛋白更具特异性,比肌红蛋白更敏感。以往研究主要关注生肌调节因子和MyoD1在小圆细胞肿瘤中的表达。本研究评估生肌调节因子和MyoD1在横纹肌肉瘤亚型以及横纹肌肉瘤鉴别诊断中考虑的梭形细胞肿瘤中的表达情况。采用标准免疫组织化学技术,对32例横纹肌肉瘤、107例非横纹肌肉瘤及11例良性骨骼肌样本的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋存档组织进行生肌调节因子和MyoD1染色。核阳性采用三级评分。所有横纹肌肉瘤均表达生肌调节因子。腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤(ARMS)显示强核染色,尤其在纤维间隔和血管周围区域的肿瘤细胞中。在常规染色切片上具有细微腺泡结构的病例中,生肌调节因子突出并增强了腺泡形态模式的可视化。胚胎型横纹肌肉瘤(ERMS)生肌调节因子染色模式和强度变化更大。结节性筋膜炎、恶性纤维组织细胞瘤、恶性外周神经鞘瘤、炎性肌成纤维细胞瘤、肌纤维肉瘤、平滑肌瘤、平滑肌肉瘤或腺泡状软组织肉瘤均无生肌调节因子染色。在硬纤维瘤(10例中的2例)、婴儿肌纤维瘤病(10例中的2例)、滑膜肉瘤(10例中的1例)和婴儿纤维肉瘤(10例中的2例)中可见局灶性核反应。在肿瘤相关样本(40例中的25例)和良性骨骼肌样本(11例中的5例)中,非肿瘤性骨骼肌纤维核生肌调节因子染色均为阳性。虽然所有横纹肌肉瘤MyoD1均呈免疫反应性,但本研究中细胞质和非特异性背景染色以及非肌样组织的反应性妨碍了其在石蜡包埋样本中的实际应用。虽然生肌调节因子是横纹肌肉瘤高度敏感且特异的标志物,但在其他梭形细胞软组织肿瘤中很少见。如先前报道,腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤染色比胚胎型横纹肌肉瘤更强。与以往研究不同,罕见的非横纹肌肉瘤(107例中的7例)显示局灶性核反应,且包埋的萎缩或再生骨骼肌纤维也呈阳性染色。虽然这些是生肌调节因子解读中的潜在陷阱,但仔细观察形态学及其他特征、非横纹肌肉瘤中生肌调节因子阳性核相对较少以及存在包埋的肌纤维应可防止错误解读。由于横纹肌肉瘤中生肌调节因子表达程度远高于非横纹肌肉瘤,因此结合其他临床病理数据进行解读时,它是一个非常有用的标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验