Suppr超能文献

视觉注意力的空间分辨率。

The spatial resolution of visual attention.

作者信息

Intriligator J, Cavanagh P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0755.

Abstract

Two tasks were used to evaluate the grain of visual attention, the minimum spacing at which attention can select individual items. First, observers performed a tracking task at many viewing distances. When the display subtended less than 1 degrees in size, tracking was no longer possible even though observers could resolve the items and their motions: The items were visible but could not be individuated one from the other. The limiting size for selection was roughly the same whether tracking one or three targets, suggesting that the resolution limit acts independently of the capacity limit of attention. Second, the closest spacing that still allowed individuation of single items in dense, static displays was examined. This critical spacing was about 50% coarser in the radial direction compared to the tangential direction and was coarser in the upper as opposed to the lower visual field. The results suggest that no more than about 60 items can be arrayed in the central 30 degrees of the visual field while still allowing attentional access to each individually. Our data show that selection has a coarse grain, much coarser than visual resolution. These measures of the resolution of attention are based solely on the selection of location and are not confounded with preattentive feature interactions that may contribute to measures from flanker and crowding tasks. The results suggest that the parietal area is the most likely locus of this selection mechanism and that it acts by pointing to the spatial coordinates (or cortical coordinates) of items of interest rather than by holding a representation of the items themselves.

摘要

我们使用了两项任务来评估视觉注意的粒度,即注意能够选择单个项目的最小间距。首先,观察者在多个观察距离下执行跟踪任务。当显示屏的视角小于1度时,即使观察者能够分辨项目及其运动,跟踪也不再可能:项目是可见的,但无法彼此区分。无论跟踪一个还是三个目标,选择的极限大小大致相同,这表明分辨率极限的作用独立于注意的容量极限。其次,研究了在密集的静态显示中仍能区分单个项目的最接近间距。与切线方向相比,这个临界间距在径向方向上大约粗50%,并且在视野上部比下部更粗。结果表明,在视野中央30度范围内,排列的项目不超过约60个时,仍能让注意逐个访问每个项目。我们的数据表明,选择具有较粗的粒度,比视觉分辨率粗得多。这些注意分辨率的测量仅基于位置的选择,并且不会与可能影响侧翼任务和拥挤任务测量结果的前注意特征交互混淆。结果表明,顶叶区域最有可能是这种选择机制的位置,并且它通过指向感兴趣项目的空间坐标(或皮层坐标)来起作用,而不是通过持有项目本身的表征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验