Richardson L D, Hwang U
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;8(11):1030-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01111.x.
The authors review the evolution of the emergency medicine literature regarding emergency department (ED) use and access to care over the past 20 years. They discuss the impact of cost containment and the emergence of managed care on prevailing views of ED utilization. In the 1980s, the characterization of "nonurgent ED visits" as "inappropriate" and high ED charges led to the targeting of non-emergency ED care as a potential source of savings. During the 1990s the literature reveals multiple attempts to identify "inappropriate" ED visits and to develop strategies to triage these visits away from the ED. By the late 1990s, demonstration of the risks of denying emergency care and more sophisticated analyses of actual costs led to reconsideration of initiatives to limit access to ED care and renewed focus on the critical role of the ED as a safety net provider. In recent years, "de facto" denials of emergency care due to long ED waiting times and other adverse consequences of ED crowding have begun to dominate the emergency medicine health services literature.
作者回顾了过去20年中急诊医学文献中关于急诊科(ED)使用和医疗服务可及性的演变。他们讨论了成本控制的影响以及管理式医疗的出现对急诊利用主流观点的影响。在20世纪80年代,将“非紧急急诊就诊”描述为“不适当”以及急诊高额费用,导致将非急诊急诊医疗作为潜在的节省来源。在20世纪90年代,文献显示出多次尝试识别“不适当”的急诊就诊,并制定策略将这些就诊从急诊科分流。到20世纪90年代末,拒绝急诊医疗的风险的证明以及对实际成本的更复杂分析,导致重新考虑限制急诊医疗可及性的举措,并重新关注急诊科作为安全网提供者的关键作用。近年来,由于急诊等待时间过长以及急诊拥挤的其他不良后果导致的“事实上”的急诊医疗拒绝,已开始在急诊医学卫生服务文献中占据主导地位。