Ylä-Mattila Jari, Koivistoinen Teemu, Siippainen Henna, Huhtala Heini, Mustajoki Sami
Emergency Department, Tampere University Hospital.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 1;32(1):22-28. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001156. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
Existing data are limited for determining the medical conditions best suited for an emergency department (ED) redirection strategy in a heterogeneous, nonurgent patient population.
The aim was to establish factors associated with hospital revisits within 7 days among patients discharged or redirected by a triage team.
DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational single-center case-control study was conducted at the Tampere University Hospital ED for the full calendar year of 2019. The cases comprised unplanned hospital revisits within 7 days of being discharged or redirected by triage, while the controls were discharged or redirected but did not revisit.
The primary outcome was an unplanned hospital revisit within 7 days. A subgroup analysis was conducted for revisits leading to hospitalization. Basic demographics, comorbidities before triage, and triage visit characteristics were considered as predictive factors for the revisit. A backward stepwise conditional logistic regression analysis was performed.
During the calendar year of 2019, there were a total of 92 406 ED visits. Of these, 7216 (7.8%) visits were discharged or redirected by triage, and 6.5% ( n = 467) of all these patients revisited. Of the revisiting patients, 25% ( n = 117) were hospitalized. In multivariable analysis, higher age was associated with both revisitation [odds ratio (OR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.02] and hospitalization (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04). Furthermore, using other visits as a reference, abdominal pain was associated with revisitation and hospitalization (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 2.24-6.11 and OR: 5.28, 95% CI: 2.08-13.4, respectively).
Higher age and abdominal pain were associated with hospital revisitation and hospitalization within 7 days among patients directly discharged or redirected by the triage team. Regardless of the triage system in use, there might be patient groups that should be evaluated more cautiously if a triage-based discharge or redirection strategy is to be considered.
现有数据有限,难以确定在异质性、非紧急患者群体中最适合急诊科(ED)分流策略的医疗状况。
目的是确定由分诊团队出院或分流的患者在7天内再次入院的相关因素。
设计、地点和参与者:在坦佩雷大学医院急诊科于2019年全年进行了一项观察性单中心病例对照研究。病例包括在分诊出院或分流后7天内的非计划再次入院,而对照是出院或分流但未再次入院的患者。
主要结局是7天内的非计划再次入院。对导致住院的再次入院进行了亚组分析。基本人口统计学、分诊前的合并症以及分诊就诊特征被视为再次入院的预测因素。进行了向后逐步条件逻辑回归分析。
在2019年全年,急诊科共有92406次就诊。其中,7216次(7.8%)就诊由分诊出院或分流,所有这些患者中有6.5%(n = 467)再次入院。在再次入院的患者中,25%(n = 117)住院治疗。在多变量分析中,较高年龄与再次入院[比值比(OR):1.01,95%置信区间(CI):1.00 - 1.02]和住院治疗(OR:1.02,95% CI:1.00 - 1.04)均相关。此外,以其他就诊为参照,腹痛与再次入院和住院治疗相关(分别为OR:3.70,95% CI:2.24 - 6.11和OR:5.28,95% CI:2.08 - 13.4)。
较高年龄和腹痛与分诊团队直接出院或分流的患者在7天内再次入院及住院治疗相关。无论使用何种分诊系统,如果要考虑基于分诊的出院或分流策略,可能存在一些患者群体应更谨慎地进行评估。