Ragde H, Grado G L, Nadir B S
Grado-Ragde Clinics, 1330 Meridian Ave N., Ste 300, Seattle, WA 98177, USA.
Arch Esp Urol. 2001 Sep;54(7):739-47.
To report 13-year biochemical disease-free survival results on 769 consecutive prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy alone.
Seven hundred sixty-nine patients with stage T1-T3, low to high Gleason grade prostate cancer underwent transperineal prostate implants with Iodine-125 (I-125) or Palladium-103 (Pd-103) as the sole treatment between January 1, 1987 and January 1, 1997. Median age was 69 years (range 43-92) and median follow-up was 71 months (range 18-156). Study cohort characteristics are summarized in Tables I and II and Figures 4-6. The patients were divided into two risk groups (low and high risk for extra-prostatic disease) based mainly on clinical stage and Gleason score. Group 1 consisted of 542 patients, who were considered at low risk and were treated with I-125. Group 2 comprised 227 patients, who were considered higher risk and were treated with Pd-103. No patient underwent pathological staging and none received androgen ablative therapy. Treatment failure was based on our modification of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology's (ASTRO) recommended failure criteria, defined as 3 consecutive serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) rises (1). A critical component in our modification is that the value of the third PSA rise be above 0.5 ng/mL.
One hundred thirty-seven patients were lost to follow-up. Thirteen patients expired of non-cancer causes within 18 months of the implant. This left 619 patients for evaluation, 441 in Group 1 and 178 in Group 2. The biochemical disease-free survival rates of the 619 patients at 3, 5, 10, and 13 years were 85%, 80%, 77%, and 77%, respectively (Fig. 1). The biochemical disease-free survival rates of the 441 "lower risk" I-125 treated patients at 3, 5, 10, and 13 years were 84%, 79%, 76%, and 76%, respectively (Fig. 2). The biochemical disease-free survival rates of the 178 "higher risk" Pd-103 treated patients at 3, 5, 10, and 13 years were 87%, 82%, 80%, and 80%, respectively (Fig. 3).
The excellent long-term results presented here, as well as the many advantages of prostate brachytherapy over other common treatments, demonstrate that brachytherapy is an effective treatment for clinical organ-confined prostate cancer in the long term.
报告769例仅接受近距离放射治疗的前列腺癌患者13年无生化疾病生存结果。
1987年1月1日至1997年1月1日期间,769例T1 - T3期、Gleason分级低至高的前列腺癌患者接受了经会阴前列腺碘-125(I - 125)或钯-103(Pd - 103)植入,作为唯一治疗方式。中位年龄为69岁(范围43 - 92岁),中位随访时间为71个月(范围18 - 156个月)。研究队列特征总结于表I、II及图4 - 6。患者主要根据临床分期和Gleason评分分为两个风险组(前列腺外疾病低风险和高风险)。第1组由542例被认为低风险的患者组成,接受I - 125治疗。第2组包括227例被认为高风险的患者,接受Pd - 103治疗。没有患者进行病理分期,也没有患者接受雄激素剥夺治疗。治疗失败基于我们对美国放射治疗及肿瘤学会(ASTRO)推荐的失败标准的修改,定义为连续3次血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)升高(1)。我们修改中的一个关键因素是第三次PSA升高的值高于0.5 ng/mL。
137例患者失访。13例患者在植入后18个月内死于非癌症原因。这使得619例患者可供评估,第1组441例,第2组178例。619例患者在3年、5年、10年和13年的无生化疾病生存率分别为85%、80%、77%和77%(图1)。441例接受I - 125治疗的“低风险”患者在3年、5年、10年和13年的无生化疾病生存率分别为84%、79%、76%和76%(图2)。178例接受Pd - 103治疗的“高风险”患者在3年、5年、10年和13年的无生化疾病生存率分别为87%、82%、80%和80%(图3)。
本文呈现的出色长期结果,以及前列腺近距离放射治疗相对于其他常见治疗的诸多优势,表明近距离放射治疗是临床局限期前列腺癌的一种长期有效治疗方法。