Wermeling D P, Miller J L, Archer S M, Manaligod J M, Rudy A C
Drug Product Evaluation Unit of the University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington 40536-0093, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Nov;41(11):1225-31. doi: 10.1177/00912700122012779.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of intranasal lorazepam in comparison to currently established administration routes. Eleven healthy volunteers completed this randomized crossover study. On three occasions, each separated by a 1-week washout, subjects received a 2 mg dose of lorazepam via the intranasal, intravenous, or intramuscular route. Blood samples were collected serially from 0 to 36 hours. Noncompartmental methods were used to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. Lorazepam was well absorbed following intranasal administration with a mean (%CV) bioavailability of 77.7(11.1). Intranasal administration resulted in a faster absorption rate than intramuscular administration. Elimination profiles were comparable between all three routes. The concentration-time profile for intranasal delivery demonstrated evidence of a double peak in several subjects, suggesting partial oral absorption. Females were found to have significantly higher AUC values than males for all three delivery routes. Overall, this study demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetics of intranasal lorazepam in relation to standard administration methods. Intranasal delivery could provide an alternative, noninvasive delivery route for lorazepam.
本研究的目的是评估与目前已确立的给药途径相比,鼻内给予劳拉西泮的药代动力学特征。11名健康志愿者完成了这项随机交叉研究。在三个不同的时间点,每次间隔1周的洗脱期,受试者分别通过鼻内、静脉或肌肉注射途径接受2mg剂量的劳拉西泮。在0至36小时内连续采集血样。采用非房室模型方法确定药代动力学参数。鼻内给药后劳拉西泮吸收良好,平均(%CV)生物利用度为77.7(11.1)。鼻内给药的吸收速度比肌肉注射更快。三种给药途径的消除特征相当。鼻内给药的浓度-时间曲线在几名受试者中显示出双峰迹象,提示存在部分口服吸收。发现女性在所有三种给药途径下的AUC值均显著高于男性。总体而言,本研究表明鼻内给予劳拉西泮相对于标准给药方法具有良好的药代动力学特性。鼻内给药可为劳拉西泮提供一种替代性的非侵入性给药途径。