Suppr超能文献

静脉注射、肌肉注射和鼻内给予纳洛酮在人类志愿者中的群体药代动力学。

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous, intramuscular, and intranasal naloxone in human volunteers.

作者信息

Dowling Jonathonm, Isbister Geoffrey K, Kirkpatrick Carl M J, Naidoo Daya, Graudins Andis

机构信息

Clinical and Experimental Toxicology Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 2008 Aug;30(4):490-6. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181816214.

Abstract

To investigate the pharmacokinetics of naloxone in healthy volunteers, we undertook an open-label crossover study in which six male volunteers received naloxone on five occasions: intravenous (0.8 mg), intramuscular (0.8 mg), intranasal (0.8 mg), intravenous (2 mg), and intranasal (2 mg). Samples were collected for 4 hours after administration for 128 samples in total. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was undertaken using NONMEM. The data were best described by a three-compartment model with first-order absorption for intramuscular and intranasal administration, between-subject variability on clearance and central volume, lean body weight on clearance, and weight on central volume. Relative bioavailability of intramuscular and intranasal naloxone was 36% and 4%, respectively. The final parameter estimates were clearance, 91 L/hr; central volume, 2.87 L; first peripheral compartment volume, 1.49 L, second peripheral compartment volume, 33.6 L; first intercompartmental clearance, 5.66 L/hr; second intercompartmental clearance, 29.8 L/hr; Ka (intramuscular), 0.65; and Ka (intranasal), 1.52. Median time to peak concentration for intramuscular naloxone was 12 minutes and for intranasal, 6 to 9 minutes. A combination of intravenous and intramuscular naloxone provided immediate high and then detectable concentrations for 4 hours. Intranasal naloxone had poor bioavailability compared with intramuscular. Combined intravenous and intramuscular administration may be a useful alternative to naloxone infusions.

摘要

为研究纳洛酮在健康志愿者体内的药代动力学,我们进行了一项开放标签交叉研究,6名男性志愿者分五次接受纳洛酮:静脉注射(0.8毫克)、肌肉注射(0.8毫克)、鼻内给药(0.8毫克)、静脉注射(2毫克)和鼻内给药(2毫克)。给药后采集样本4小时,共采集128个样本。使用NONMEM进行群体药代动力学分析。数据最好用三室模型描述,肌肉注射和鼻内给药为一级吸收,清除率和中央室容积存在个体间差异,清除率与瘦体重有关,中央室容积与体重有关。肌肉注射和鼻内给药的纳洛酮相对生物利用度分别为36%和4%。最终参数估计值为:清除率91升/小时;中央室容积2.87升;第一外周室容积1.49升,第二外周室容积33.6升;第一室间清除率5.66升/小时;第二室间清除率29.8升/小时;Ka(肌肉注射)0.65;Ka(鼻内给药)1.52。肌肉注射纳洛酮达到峰值浓度的中位时间为12分钟,鼻内给药为6至9分钟。静脉注射和肌肉注射联合使用纳洛酮可立即产生高浓度,随后4小时内浓度可检测到。与肌肉注射相比,鼻内给药的纳洛酮生物利用度较差。静脉注射和肌肉注射联合给药可能是纳洛酮输注的一种有用替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验