Fett Jordan, Hackbarth Richard, Boville Brian M, Olivero Anthony D, Davis Alan T, Winters John W
Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, United States.
Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States.
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2017 Sep;6(3):182-187. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597696. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
To compare efficacy and safety of two moderate sedation regimens for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE): intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam (DM) versus oral chloral hydrate (CH) syrup. This was a retrospective cohort of 93 children under 4 years of age receiving moderate sedation with either DM or CH for TTE from January 2011 through December 2014. Forty-nine patients received oral CH and 44 received the intranasal combination of DM. The demographics between groups were similar except the DM patients were slightly older and heavier (each < 0.05). Failure rate between groups did not reach statistical significance (CH 14.3% vs. DM 6.8%; = 0.324). Total sedation to discharge time was similar between groups (CH 89.4 minutes vs. DM 89.6 minute; = 0.97). Cardiopulmonary data did reveal a significantly lower heart rate (101.9 vs. 91.7; < 0.001) and respiratory rate (23.4 vs. 21.0, = 0.03) in the DM group, but no difference in blood pressure measurements or echo determined shortening fraction. These data support the use of intranasal DM as a safe and efficacious method of moderate sedation for children undergoing TTE.
比较两种用于经胸超声心动图(TTE)的中度镇静方案的疗效和安全性:鼻内给予右美托咪定 - 咪达唑仑(DM)与口服水合氯醛(CH)糖浆。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了93例4岁以下儿童,他们在2011年1月至2014年12月期间接受了DM或CH用于TTE的中度镇静。49例患者接受口服CH,44例接受鼻内DM联合用药。两组间的人口统计学特征相似,只是DM组患者年龄稍大、体重稍重(均P<0.05)。两组间的失败率未达到统计学显著差异(CH组为14.3%,DM组为6.8%;P = 0.324)。两组间从镇静开始到出院的总时间相似(CH组为89.4分钟,DM组为89.6分钟;P = 0.97)。心肺数据显示DM组心率显著更低(分别为101.9对91.7;P<0.001)、呼吸频率显著更低(分别为23.4对21.0,P = 0.03),但血压测量值或超声心动图测定的缩短分数无差异。这些数据支持鼻内使用DM作为接受TTE的儿童中度镇静的一种安全有效的方法。