• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam versus Oral Chloral Hydrate Targeting Moderate Sedation during Pediatric Transthoracic Echocardiograms.小儿经胸超声心动图检查期间,鼻内给予右美托咪定-咪达唑仑与口服水合氯醛用于中度镇静的比较效果
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2017 Sep;6(3):182-187. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597696. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
2
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and chloral hydrate sedation for transthoracic echocardiography in infants and toddlers: a randomized clinical trial.右美托咪定与水合氯醛用于婴幼儿经胸超声心动图检查镇静效果的比较:一项随机临床试验
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Mar;26(3):266-72. doi: 10.1111/pan.12819. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
A randomized controlled trial of oral chloral hydrate vs intranasal dexmedetomidine plus buccal midazolam for auditory brainstem response testing in children.口服水合氯醛与鼻内右美托咪定加颊部咪达唑仑用于儿童听觉脑干反应测试的随机对照试验
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Nov;28(11):1022-1028. doi: 10.1111/pan.13498. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Comparison of intranasal midazolam, intranasal ketamine, and oral chloral hydrate for conscious sedation during paediatric echocardiography: results of a prospective randomised study.小儿超声心动图检查期间鼻内咪达唑仑、鼻内氯胺酮和口服水合氯醛用于清醒镇静的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究的结果
Cardiol Young. 2019 Sep;29(9):1189-1195. doi: 10.1017/S1047951119001835.
5
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intranasal Midazolam and Chloral Hydrate for Procedural Sedation in Children.一项比较鼻内咪达唑仑和水合氯醛用于儿童操作镇静的随机对照试验。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec;153(6):1042-50. doi: 10.1177/0194599815599381. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
6
Comparative study of intranasal dexmedetomidine v/s midazolam for sedation of pediatric patients during transthoracic echocardiography.经胸超声心动图检查时,鼻内给予右美托咪定与咪达唑仑镇静的小儿对比研究。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2021 Apr-Jun;24(2):224-229. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_17_20.
7
Intranasal dexmedetomidine: the ideal drug for sedation in the pediatric echo lab?鼻内注射右美托咪定:小儿超声心动图实验室中理想的镇静药物?
Cardiol Young. 2022 Apr;32(4):545-549. doi: 10.1017/S1047951121002493. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
8
Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral chloral hydrate for diagnostic procedures sedation in infants and toddlers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于婴幼儿诊断性操作镇静的鼻内右美托咪定与口服水合氯醛:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19001. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019001.
9
Comparison of sedation by intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate for pediatric ophthalmic examination.鼻内给予右美托咪定与口服水合氯醛用于小儿眼科检查的镇静效果比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jun;27(6):629-636. doi: 10.1111/pan.13148. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
10
A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate for sedated auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing.一项关于鼻内给予右美托咪定与口服水合氯醛用于镇静听觉脑干反应(ABR)测试的前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Mar;26(3):286-93. doi: 10.1111/pan.12854.

引用本文的文献

1
An evaluation of dexmedetomidine in combination with midazolam in pediatric sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.右美托咪定联合咪达唑仑在儿科镇静中的评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02570-1.
2
Predictors of pediatric sedation failure with initial dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam.经鼻给予右美托咪定初始剂量和口服咪达唑仑预防小儿镇静失败的预测因素。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Dec;94(6):2054-2061. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02758-0. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries.口服咪达唑仑与鼻内给予右美托咪定对接受手术的儿童术前镇静及麻醉诱导效果的比较
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 15;12:648699. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.648699. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate for sedated auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing.一项关于鼻内给予右美托咪定与口服水合氯醛用于镇静听觉脑干反应(ABR)测试的前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Mar;26(3):286-93. doi: 10.1111/pan.12854.
2
Efficacy of Reconstituted Oral Chloral Hydrate from Crystals for Echocardiography Sedation.晶体状水合氯醛复溶后用于超声心动图镇静的疗效
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Apr;29(4):337-40. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.11.014. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
3
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and chloral hydrate sedation for transthoracic echocardiography in infants and toddlers: a randomized clinical trial.右美托咪定与水合氯醛用于婴幼儿经胸超声心动图检查镇静效果的比较:一项随机临床试验
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Mar;26(3):266-72. doi: 10.1111/pan.12819. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
4
Intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing transthoracic echocardiography study--a prospective observational study.经鼻给予右美托咪定用于小儿经胸超声心动图检查时的镇静——一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Sep;25(9):891-6. doi: 10.1111/pan.12687. Epub 2015 May 9.
5
A randomised study of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral ketamine for premedication in children.一项关于鼻内给予右美托咪定和口服氯胺酮作为儿童用药前用药的随机研究。
Anaesthesia. 2013 Sep;68(9):944-9. doi: 10.1111/anae.12312. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
6
Aerosolized intranasal midazolam for safe and effective sedation for quality computed tomography imaging in infants and children.雾化鼻内咪达唑仑在婴儿和儿童中安全有效进行 CT 成像检查的镇静作用。
J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;163(4):1217-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
7
Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.鼻内给予右美托咪定与鼻内给予氯胺酮作为接受MRI检查儿童程序性镇静术前用药的比较:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):12-8. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1657-x. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
8
Intranasal dexmedetomidine for paediatric sedation for diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging studies.用于小儿诊断性磁共振成像检查镇静的鼻内注射右美托咪定
Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;56(6):587-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.104588.
9
Comparison of buccal and nasal dexmedetomidine premedication for pediatric patients.小儿患者口腔和鼻腔给予右美托咪定术前用药的比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Feb;23(2):134-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12025. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
10
A randomised comparison of two intranasal dexmedetomidine doses for premedication in children.两种不同剂量的鼻腔内用右美托咪定用于儿童术前用药的随机比较。
Anaesthesia. 2012 Nov;67(11):1210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07309.x. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

小儿经胸超声心动图检查期间,鼻内给予右美托咪定-咪达唑仑与口服水合氯醛用于中度镇静的比较效果

Comparative Effectiveness of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam versus Oral Chloral Hydrate Targeting Moderate Sedation during Pediatric Transthoracic Echocardiograms.

作者信息

Fett Jordan, Hackbarth Richard, Boville Brian M, Olivero Anthony D, Davis Alan T, Winters John W

机构信息

Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, United States.

Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States.

出版信息

J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2017 Sep;6(3):182-187. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597696. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1055/s-0036-1597696
PMID:31073445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6260306/
Abstract

To compare efficacy and safety of two moderate sedation regimens for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE): intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam (DM) versus oral chloral hydrate (CH) syrup.  This was a retrospective cohort of 93 children under 4 years of age receiving moderate sedation with either DM or CH for TTE from January 2011 through December 2014.  Forty-nine patients received oral CH and 44 received the intranasal combination of DM. The demographics between groups were similar except the DM patients were slightly older and heavier (each  < 0.05). Failure rate between groups did not reach statistical significance (CH 14.3% vs. DM 6.8%;  = 0.324). Total sedation to discharge time was similar between groups (CH 89.4 minutes vs. DM 89.6 minute;  = 0.97). Cardiopulmonary data did reveal a significantly lower heart rate (101.9 vs. 91.7;  < 0.001) and respiratory rate (23.4 vs. 21.0,  = 0.03) in the DM group, but no difference in blood pressure measurements or echo determined shortening fraction.  These data support the use of intranasal DM as a safe and efficacious method of moderate sedation for children undergoing TTE.

摘要

比较两种用于经胸超声心动图(TTE)的中度镇静方案的疗效和安全性:鼻内给予右美托咪定 - 咪达唑仑(DM)与口服水合氯醛(CH)糖浆。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了93例4岁以下儿童,他们在2011年1月至2014年12月期间接受了DM或CH用于TTE的中度镇静。49例患者接受口服CH,44例接受鼻内DM联合用药。两组间的人口统计学特征相似,只是DM组患者年龄稍大、体重稍重(均P<0.05)。两组间的失败率未达到统计学显著差异(CH组为14.3%,DM组为6.8%;P = 0.324)。两组间从镇静开始到出院的总时间相似(CH组为89.4分钟,DM组为89.6分钟;P = 0.97)。心肺数据显示DM组心率显著更低(分别为101.9对91.7;P<0.001)、呼吸频率显著更低(分别为23.4对21.0,P = 0.03),但血压测量值或超声心动图测定的缩短分数无差异。这些数据支持鼻内使用DM作为接受TTE的儿童中度镇静的一种安全有效的方法。