Papagelopoulos P J, Sapkas G S, Kateros K T, Papadakis S A, Vlamis J A, Falagas M E
First Orthopaedic Department, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Oct 1;26(19):E463-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00030.
Report of a patient with an epidural abscess after halo pin intracranial penetration at the site of a previous cranioplasty.
To report a rare case of intracranial penetration at the site of a previous cranioplasty associated with epidural abscess, and to discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to its management.
The most serious complications associated with use of halo device occur when pins penetrate the inner table of the skull, resulting in cerebrospinal fluid leak and rarely in an intracranial abscess. However, no mention of intracranial halo pin penetration at the site of a previous cranioplasty was found in the literature.
A 64-year-old man with ankylosing spondylitis had a halo vest placed for management of a fracture dislocation through the C5-C6 intervertebral disc space associated with left C6 radiculopathy. One week later, the patient experienced fever and headache associated with pain, redness, and drainage at the site of the insertion of the left posterior pin. Computed tomography of the brain showed a 1.5-cm intracranial penetration of the halo pin through a previous cranioplasty of the temporal bone, associated with epidural abscess and cerebral edema in the left temporoparietal lobe. The pins and the halo vest were removed, the pin site was cleaned, and a Philadelphia cervical collar was applied. Staphylococcus epidermidis grew on the culture of drainage from the pin site. The patient started immediate intravenous antibiotic treatment for 2 weeks, followed by oral antibiotics for 2 additional weeks.
The patient had gradual improvement of his symptoms within the first 48 hours. At the latest follow-up visit, he had fully recovered and his fracture had healed.
The halo device should not be used for patients with a previous cranioplasty, especially if the pins cannot be inserted at other safe areas of the skull. A thorough medical history and physical examination of the skull are important before the application of a halo device. Computed tomography of the skull may be necessary before elective halo application for patients with concomitant head trauma, confusion, or intoxication and for patients with a previous cranioplasty to ascertain the safest pin sites.
一名患者在先前颅骨成形术部位经头环钉颅内穿透后发生硬膜外脓肿的病例报告。
报告一例先前颅骨成形术部位颅内穿透合并硬膜外脓肿的罕见病例,并探讨其诊断和治疗方法。
使用头环装置最严重的并发症发生在钉穿透颅骨内板时,导致脑脊液漏,很少发生颅内脓肿。然而,文献中未提及先前颅骨成形术部位的颅内头环钉穿透情况。
一名64岁强直性脊柱炎男性因C5 - C6椎间盘间隙骨折脱位伴左侧C6神经根病而佩戴头环背心。一周后,患者出现发热、头痛,伴有左侧后钉插入部位疼痛、发红和渗液。脑部计算机断层扫描显示头环钉经先前颞骨颅骨成形术部位颅内穿透1.5厘米,伴有左侧颞顶叶硬膜外脓肿和脑水肿。移除头环钉和头环背心,清洁钉孔部位,并佩戴费城颈托。钉孔部位引流液培养出表皮葡萄球菌。患者立即开始静脉注射抗生素治疗2周,随后口服抗生素再治疗2周。
患者在最初48小时内症状逐渐改善。在最近一次随访时,他已完全康复,骨折也已愈合。
对于先前有颅骨成形术的患者,不应使用头环装置,尤其是在颅骨其他安全区域无法插入钉的情况下。在应用头环装置之前,详细的病史询问和颅骨体格检查很重要。对于伴有头部外伤、意识模糊或中毒的患者以及先前有颅骨成形术的患者,在择期应用头环之前,可能需要进行颅骨计算机断层扫描以确定最安全的钉插入部位。