• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用陶瓷嵌体或树脂基复合材料进行粘结修复后的磨牙抗折性。

Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.

作者信息

Bremer B D, Geurtsen W

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Medical University Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):216-20.

PMID:11699740
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the fracture resistance of teeth, following treatment with various types of adhesive restorations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

5 0 caries-free, extracted human molars were randomly divided into five groups consisting of 10 molars each. MOD cavities were prepared in 40 molars with a width in the facio-lingual direction of 50% of the intercuspal distances. The cavities were filled with the following materials: Cerec or IPS Empress ceramic inlays, Arabesk or Charisma F resin-based composite (RBC) restorations. The control group consisted of 10 sound, non-restored molars. All 50 teeth were loaded occlusally until fracture using a tensile testing machine. The statistical analysis included ANOVA, Kolmogorov-Smimov-test, Scheffé test, and boxplots.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the mean values of the sound teeth (2,102 N) and the teeth with the Cerec ceramic inlays (2,139 N). However, both groups demonstrated a significant difference (P < 0.05) when compared with the teeth with IPS Empress ceramic inlays (1,459 N) and Arabesk RBC restorations (1459 N). No significant differences were found between the last two groups. Molars restored with Charisma F composite restorations (1,562 N) revealed no significant difference when compared with all other groups including controls (P > 0.05). A stabilization of molars is possible by means of an adhesive restoration in the form of an "internal splinting" regardless of the restorative material used.

摘要

目的

确定经各种类型粘结修复治疗后牙齿的抗折性。

材料与方法

50颗无龋的拔除人类磨牙随机分为五组,每组10颗磨牙。在40颗磨牙上制备MOD洞,颊舌向宽度为牙尖间距离的50%。用以下材料填充洞:Cerec或IPS Empress陶瓷嵌体、Arabesk或Charisma F树脂基复合材料(RBC)修复体。对照组由10颗完好、未修复的磨牙组成。使用拉伸试验机对所有50颗牙齿进行咬合加载直至折断。统计分析包括方差分析、柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验、谢费检验和箱线图。

结果

完好牙齿(2102N)和Cerec陶瓷嵌体修复牙齿(2139N)的平均值之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,与IPS Empress陶瓷嵌体修复牙齿(1459N)和Arabesk RBC修复体(1459N)相比,这两组均显示出显著差异(P<0.05)。最后两组之间未发现显著差异。Charisma F复合树脂修复体修复的磨牙(1562N)与包括对照组在内的所有其他组相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。无论使用何种修复材料,通过“内部夹板”形式的粘结修复可实现磨牙的稳定。

相似文献

1
Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.使用陶瓷嵌体或树脂基复合材料进行粘结修复后的磨牙抗折性。
Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):216-20.
2
Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.使用复合树脂直接和间接修复以及使用陶瓷材料间接修复的牙齿的抗折性。
Am J Dent. 2002 Dec;15(6):389-94.
3
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.磨牙中复合树脂与陶瓷嵌体的强度和粘结力的三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):131-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60029-3.
4
Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.在MOD II类洞形制备中,采用粘结直接复合树脂和间接陶瓷嵌体修复的牙齿的疲劳负荷。
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Jan-Feb;16(1):64-9.
5
Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.采用直接和间接粘结技术修复的上颌前磨牙的抗折性
J Can Dent Assoc. 2005 Sep;71(8):585.
6
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.采用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)陶瓷嵌体修复的上颌前磨牙根管治疗后的抗折性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Oct;94(4):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.004.
7
All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.天然磨牙的全瓷部分覆盖修复体。咀嚼疲劳载荷与抗折性。
Am J Dent. 2007 Feb;20(1):21-6.
8
The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.纤维植入对用复合树脂修复的有MOD洞形预备的根管充填磨牙抗折性的影响。
Int Endod J. 2005 Feb;38(2):73-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00892.x.
9
In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations.不同粘结修复体修复后牙牙尖抗折性的体外比较
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jul-Aug;14(4):374-8.
10
In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.直接陶瓷嵌体与牙面在界面处采用纤维增强复合材料的推出粘结强度的体外评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 May;97(5):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.04.002.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of passive ultrasonic irrigation on the bond strength of two different self-etch adhesives to human pulp chamber dentine: a laboratory investigation.被动超声冲洗对两种不同自酸蚀粘结剂与人类牙髓腔牙本质粘结强度的影响:一项实验室研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05858-x.
2
Unveiling the mechanical performance of partially replaced coronal restorations in root canal-treated teeth: an in-vitro study.揭示根管治疗后牙齿部分冠修复体的力学性能:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 27;24(1):1562. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05180-y.
3
Fracture resistance of bonded ceramic overlay restorations prepared in various designs.
各种设计制备的粘结陶瓷覆盖体修复体的抗折强度。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 5;12(1):16599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21167-7.
4
An investigation on the reinforcing potential of contemporary composites in weakened bicuspids.当代复合材料对双尖牙薄弱部位增强潜力的研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;24(6):589-593. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_279_21. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
5
Effects of Endodontic Access Cavity Design and Thermocycling on Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth.根管治疗开髓洞形设计和热循环对根管治疗后牙齿抗折强度的影响。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Apr 23;12:149-156. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S236815. eCollection 2020.
6
Fracture Toughness Comparison of Three Indirect Composite Resins Using 4-Point Flexural Strength Method.使用四点弯曲强度法对三种间接复合树脂的断裂韧性进行比较
Eur J Dent. 2020 Mar;14(2):212-216. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708438. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Comparison of the fracture resistance of three different recent composite systems in large Class II mesio-occlusal distal cavities: An study.三种不同新型复合树脂系统在大Ⅱ类近中(牙合)远中洞型中的抗折性比较:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2019 May-Jun;22(3):287-291. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_225_18.
8
Effect of restoration material on stress distribution on partial crowns: A 3D finite element analysis.修复材料对部分冠应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析
J Dent Sci. 2018 Dec;13(4):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.03.010. Epub 2018 May 5.
9
Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.窝洞预备设计和陶瓷类型对磨牙CAD/CAM高嵌体应力分布、应变及抗折性的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20180004. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0004. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
10
Do composite resin restorations protect cracked teeth? An in-vitro study.复合树脂修复体能否保护牙隐裂?一项体外研究。
Br Dent J. 2018 Aug 10;225(3):223-228. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.539. Epub 2018 Aug 3.