Moradi Zohreh, Abbasi Mahdi, Khalesi Rayhaneh, Tabatabaei Masoumeh Hasani, Shahidi Zahra
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Jondishapour University of Medical Science, Ahvaz, Iran.
Eur J Dent. 2020 Mar;14(2):212-216. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708438. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
The advantages of indirect composite restorations such as less crack formation during their computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing process, compared with ceramic restorations, have resulted in their growing popularity. However, restoration failure is a major concern with regard to the long-term clinical success of restorations and may occur as the result of propagation of a crack originated from an internal flaw in the restoration. This study aimed to compare the fracture toughness of three indirect composite resins.
In this experimental study, 10 specimens measuring 3 × 3 × 18 mm were fabricated of Gradia, Crios, and high impact polymer composite indirect composites. A single edge notch with a diameter < 0.3 mm and 0.3 mm length was created in the 9 mm longitudinal dimension of specimens using a no. 11 surgical scalpel. The specimens were then subjected to 4-point flexural strength test in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.1 mm/s until failure.
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD (honestly significant difference) test. The statistical power was set at ˂ 0.05.
One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in fracture toughness of the three composite groups ( = 0.000). According to the Tukey HSD analysis, the fracture toughness of HIPC was significantly higher than that of the other two composites. The fracture toughness of Gradia was significantly lower among all.
Within the limitations of this study, the results showed that high temperature-pressure polymerization can increase resistance to crack propagation and subsequently improve the clinical service of indirect composite restorations. Although we do not know the filler volume percentage of HIPC, it seems that filler volume percentage of the composite is inversely correlated with fracture toughness.
与陶瓷修复体相比,间接复合树脂修复体在计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造过程中形成裂纹较少等优点,使其越来越受欢迎。然而,修复体失败是修复体长期临床成功的一个主要问题,可能是由于修复体内部缺陷产生的裂纹扩展所致。本研究旨在比较三种间接复合树脂的断裂韧性。
在本实验研究中,用Gradia、Crios和高抗冲聚合物复合间接复合材料制作了10个尺寸为3×3×18mm的试件。使用11号手术刀在试件9mm的纵向尺寸上制作一个直径<0.3mm、长度为0.3mm的单边切口。然后将试件在万能试验机上进行四点弯曲强度试验,十字头速度为0.1mm/s,直至破坏。
使用IBM SPSS Statistics软件通过单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey's HSD(真实显著差异)检验对数据进行分析。设定统计学显著性水平为˂0.05。
单因素方差分析显示,三个复合材料组的断裂韧性存在显著差异(=0.000)。根据Tukey HSD分析,高抗冲聚合物复合材料(HIPC)的断裂韧性显著高于其他两种复合材料。Gradia的断裂韧性在所有材料中显著较低。
在本研究的局限性内,结果表明高温高压聚合可以增加抗裂纹扩展能力,从而改善间接复合树脂修复体的临床应用。虽然我们不知道高抗冲聚合物复合材料的填料体积百分比,但复合材料的填料体积百分比似乎与断裂韧性呈负相关。