Zaia John A., Sissons J.G. Patrick, Riddell Stanley, Diamond Don J., Wills M.R., Carmichael A.J., Weekes M.P., Gandhi M., La Rosa C., Villacres M., Lacey S., Markel S., Sun J.
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2000:339-355. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2000.1.339.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be a problem in selected populations following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Although there have been no new antiviral agents for management of this infection in recent years, the methods for using the existing agents have improved with newer assays for detection of virus. In addition, our understanding of immunity to CMV has undergone considerable expansion. This paper will address these new aspects relating to CMV infection in the setting of SCT. In Section I Dr. Zaia reviews the pathogenesis of CMV and the current epidemiology of CMV disease following marrow or blood allo-SCT with emphasis on late-onset disease. The current lab tests available for preemptive management are summarized including the role for conventional shell vial cultures, and a comparison of the CMV antigenemia assay with the new nucleic acid-based assays, including the hybrid capture assay, the NASBA assay, and "real-time" PCR assays. Use of antiviral agents with these tests in the preemptive management of CMV infection is discussed. Ultimately, what is necessary is restoration of adequate CMV immunity, and that requires understanding the basics of the CMV-specific immune response. In Section II, Dr. Sissons traces the evolution of the CTL response from primary infection into memory and reviews recent advances in the understanding of cytotoxic T cell based immunity to CMV, based on the use of T cell clonotypic analysis and markers of T cell memory and activation, with conventional CTL functional assays. In Section III Dr. Riddell presents approaches to correction of the problem of CMV pathogenesis, namely direct restoration of the CMV-specific cellular immune deficiency. Attempts at passive therapies will be reviewed with the focus on current problems and approaches to these problems. In Section IV, Dr. Diamond presents work on the identification of multiple HLA-allele specific cytotoxic T cell epitopes specific for CMV-pp65 and - pp150. Specific epitopes are recognized by CMV-seropositive individuals including healthy donors, SCT recipients, and AIDS patients, indicating their potential usefulness as vaccines. One of these epitopes is recognized by most individuals who express the HLA A(*)0201 Class I allele. Pre-clinical evaluation in HLA2.1 transgenic mice of vaccine structures utilizing this epitope, and alternative delivery systems are described. Possible methods for vaccination of donor and/or recipient of a SCT as well as their limitations, utilizing synthetic or viral vaccines, are discusseed.
巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染在造血干细胞移植(SCT)后的特定人群中仍然是一个问题。尽管近年来没有用于治疗这种感染的新型抗病毒药物,但随着检测病毒的新方法出现,现有药物的使用方法得到了改进。此外,我们对CMV免疫的理解有了很大扩展。本文将探讨SCT背景下与CMV感染相关的这些新方面。在第一部分,扎亚博士回顾了CMV的发病机制以及骨髓或血液同种异体SCT后CMV疾病的当前流行病学,重点是迟发性疾病。总结了目前可用于抢先治疗的实验室检测方法,包括传统空斑试验培养的作用,以及CMV抗原血症检测与新的基于核酸的检测方法(包括杂交捕获检测、核酸序列扩增检测和“实时”PCR检测)的比较。讨论了在CMV感染的抢先治疗中使用抗病毒药物与这些检测方法的情况。最终,需要恢复足够的CMV免疫力,这需要了解CMV特异性免疫反应的基础知识。在第二部分,西森斯博士追溯了细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)反应从初次感染到记忆的演变过程,并基于T细胞克隆型分析以及T细胞记忆和激活标记,结合传统的CTL功能检测方法,回顾了对基于细胞毒性T细胞的CMV免疫理解的最新进展。在第三部分,Riddell博士提出了纠正CMV发病机制问题的方法,即直接恢复CMV特异性细胞免疫缺陷。将回顾被动治疗的尝试,重点是当前的问题以及解决这些问题的方法。在第四部分,戴蒙德博士介绍了针对CMV-pp65和-pp150鉴定多个HLA等位基因特异性细胞毒性T细胞表位的工作。特定表位被CMV血清阳性个体识别,包括健康供体、SCT受者和艾滋病患者,表明它们作为疫苗具有潜在用途。这些表位之一被大多数表达HLA A(*)0201 I类等位基因的个体识别。描述了在HLA2.1转基因小鼠中对利用该表位的疫苗结构以及替代递送系统的临床前评估。讨论了使用合成或病毒疫苗对SCT供体和/或受者进行疫苗接种的可能方法及其局限性。