Tischer Sabine, Dieks Daria, Sukdolak Cinja, Bunse Carola, Figueiredo Constanca, Immenschuh Stephan, Borchers Sylvia, Stripecke Renata, Maecker-Kolhoff Britta, Blasczyk Rainer, Eiz-Vesper Britta
Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Hannover Germany.
Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jun;408:101-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 May 28.
Adoptive immunotherapy with donor-derived antiviral T cells can prevent viral complications such as with cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). In this context accurate monitoring of cellular immunity is essential and requires suitable quantitative and qualitative assays for high-throughput screening. We comparatively analyzed 57 HLA-typed healthy donors for memory T-cell responses to CMV- and EBV-derived proteins, peptide pools and single HLA-restricted peptides by five commonly used immunoassays in parallel: enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT), cytokine secretion assay (CSA), intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and pMHC multimer staining. T-cell responses varied greatly between the different target antigens in the investigated assays. IFN-γ ELISPOT consistently detected the highest T-cell response levels against CMV and EBV. CMV-specific T cells were detected in 100% of CMV-seropositive donors tested using CMVpp65 protein and/or overlapping CMVpp65 peptide pool. CMV-specific T cells in HLA-A02:01-positive/CMV-seropositive donors were identified directly by HLA-A02/CMVpp65 (A02pp65) multimer staining and, after short in vitro stimulation with HLA-A02:01-restricted pp65 peptide, by ELISPOT, ELISA, ICS and CSA. A peptide-specific T-cell response was detected in only 4 HLA-A02:01-positive donors (50%). Despite A02pp65 peptide negativity, T-cell responses to CMVpp65 protein and/or overlapping peptide pool were detected. Comparing the specific immune response against EBV antigens in healthy donors overall, BZLF1-specific T cells (<92.9% peptides, <56.3% peptide pool) were more frequent than EBNA-specific T cells (<64.3% peptides, <46.9% peptide pool) with higher percentage of positive findings for single HLA-restricted EBV peptides. T-cell response against HLA-B08 peptide epitopes was predominant (multimer staining: EBNA3A: 9/14 and BZLF1: 7/14, IFN-γ ELISPOT: EBNA3A: 13/14 and BZLF1: 11/14). The fact that responses to EBV-specific antigens were not detected in every single EBV-seropositive donor as well as that the T-cell frequencies in response to the investigated EBV antigens differed strongly in the donor cohort indicates that these epitopes are less immunodominant than CMVpp65. Taken together, precise monitoring of T-cell immunity against infectious agents in potential T-cell donors and post-transplant recipients requires individual selection of antigens and immunoassays for the efficient detection and generation of clinically relevant T cells. Due to its lower detection limit and direct visualization of each IFN-γ-secreting cell we identified ELISPOT analysis to be preferable for high-throughput pre-screening. CSA was found to be advantageous for a more detailed analysis of antigen-specific T-cell subsets.
采用供体来源的抗病毒T细胞进行过继性免疫治疗可预防诸如巨细胞病毒(CMV)和EB病毒(EBV)等病毒并发症。在此背景下,准确监测细胞免疫至关重要,且需要适用于高通量筛选的定量和定性检测方法。我们通过5种常用免疫测定法平行比较分析了57名经HLA分型的健康供体对CMV和EBV来源的蛋白质、肽库及单个HLA限制性肽的记忆T细胞反应:酶联免疫斑点法(ELISPOT)、细胞因子分泌测定法(CSA)、细胞内细胞因子染色法(ICS)、酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)和pMHC多聚体染色法。在所研究的检测方法中,不同靶抗原之间的T细胞反应差异很大。IFN-γ ELISPOT始终检测到针对CMV和EBV的最高T细胞反应水平。使用CMVpp65蛋白和/或重叠的CMVpp65肽库对100%检测的CMV血清阳性供体检测到CMV特异性T细胞。通过HLA-A02/CMVpp65(A02pp65)多聚体染色直接鉴定HLA-A02:01阳性/CMV血清阳性供体中的CMV特异性T细胞,并在用HLA-A02:01限制性pp65肽进行短时间体外刺激后,通过ELISPOT、ELISA、ICS和CSA鉴定。仅在4名HLA-A02:01阳性供体(50%)中检测到肽特异性T细胞反应。尽管A02pp65肽呈阴性,但仍检测到对CMVpp65蛋白和/或重叠肽库的T细胞反应。总体比较健康供体中针对EBV抗原的特异性免疫反应,BZLF1特异性T细胞(<92.9%肽,<56.3%肽库)比EBNA特异性T细胞(<64.3%肽,<46.9%肽库)更常见,单个HLA限制性EBV肽的阳性结果百分比更高。针对HLA-B08肽表位的T细胞反应占主导(多聚体染色:EBNA3A:9/14和BZLF1:7/14,IFN-γ ELISPOT:EBNA3A:13/14和BZLF1:11/14)。并非每个EBV血清阳性供体都检测到对EBV特异性抗原的反应,并且在供体队列中对所研究的EBV抗原的T细胞频率差异很大,这一事实表明这些表位的免疫优势不如CMVpp65。综上所述,精确监测潜在T细胞供体和移植后受者中针对感染因子的T细胞免疫需要为有效检测和产生临床相关T细胞而单独选择抗原和免疫测定法。由于其较低的检测限和对每个分泌IFN-γ细胞的直接可视化,我们确定ELISPOT分析更适合高通量预筛选。发现CSA有利于对抗原特异性T细胞亚群进行更详细的分析。