Suppr超能文献

谁想知道自己的医疗服务是否受到配给?公民和服务提供者的观点。

Who wants to know if their care is rationed? Views of citizens and service informants.

作者信息

Coast J

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2001 Dec;4(4):243-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00147.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the views of citizens and service informants about whether they would want to know about any rationing of their own health care.

DESIGN

In-depth interviews using a semistructured schedule. Data were analysed using the methods of constant comparison.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Citizens and service informants.

MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED

Issues around health care rationing were explored within the context of the United Kingdom health care system.

RESULTS

The views of citizens and service informants were very similar in terms of whether they, personally, wanted to know about any rationing of their own care, with the vast majority wanting to be given this information. Informants were also similar in terms of their reasons for wanting to know about rationing: to be given a 'good explanation' to enable them to judge whether the decision made had been correct; and to enable them to change the decision if necessary, either through protest or payment. Many informants suggested that they would indeed be likely to react either by challenging the decision or by paying for care.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that policies to be open with people about the rationing of care would be welcomed, but also indicate that if protest follows such openness, it may be difficult for the health service to cope with greater explicitness. Further research is needed among patient groups actually facing this situation.

摘要

目的

探讨公民和服务信息提供者对于是否想了解自身医疗保健资源分配情况的看法。

设计

采用半结构化提纲进行深入访谈。运用持续比较法对数据进行分析。

背景与参与者

公民和服务信息提供者。

研究的主要变量

在英国医疗保健系统背景下探讨围绕医疗保健资源分配的问题。

结果

在个人是否想了解自身医疗保健资源分配情况方面,公民和服务信息提供者的看法非常相似,绝大多数人希望得到这方面的信息。信息提供者在想了解资源分配情况的原因方面也相似:希望得到“合理的解释”,以便判断所做的决定是否正确;以及如有必要,能够通过抗议或付费来改变决定。许多信息提供者表示,他们确实可能会通过质疑决定或付费接受治疗来做出反应。

结论

研究结果表明,向民众公开医疗保健资源分配政策会受到欢迎,但也表明,如果这种公开引发抗议,医疗服务机构可能难以应对更高的透明度。需要对实际面临这种情况的患者群体进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Who wants to know if their care is rationed? Views of citizens and service informants.
Health Expect. 2001 Dec;4(4):243-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00147.x.
2
3
The desirability of being open about health care rationing decisions: findings from a qualitative study of patients and clinical professionals.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010 Jan;15(1):14-20. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009045. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
6
It takes a giraffe to see the big picture - citizens' view on decision makers in health care rationing.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.043. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
7
To accept, or not to accept, that is the question: citizen reactions to rationing.
Health Expect. 2014 Feb;17(1):82-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00734.x. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
8
'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making.
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jun;54(12):1825-37. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00151-4.
9
Rationing health care: views from general practice.
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Apr;42(7):1021-5. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00213-8.
10
Should rationing of health care be explicit?
Bull Med Ethics. 2002 Apr(177):20-2.

引用本文的文献

2
Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Nov;33(11):1229-36. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0307-6.
3
Exploring public attitudes towards approaches to discussing costs in the clinical encounter.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):223-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2543-9. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
4
Thorny questions on the way to disclosing rationing.
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):347-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823291ea.
5
To accept, or not to accept, that is the question: citizen reactions to rationing.
Health Expect. 2014 Feb;17(1):82-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00734.x. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
6
Cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the debates surrounding decision rules.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):903-17. doi: 10.2165/10899580-000000000-00000.
7
Bedside rationing by general practitioners: a postal survey in the Danish public healthcare system.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:192. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-192.

本文引用的文献

2
Information needs in terminal illness.
Soc Sci Med. 1999 May;48(10):1341-52. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00453-5.
3
Retracing the Oregon trail: the experience of rationing and the Oregon health plan.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1965-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1965.
4
Bridging the gap between public expectations and public willingness to pay.
Health Econ. 1997 Jan-Feb;6(1):1-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199701)6:1<1::aid-hec240>3.0.co;2-o.
5
Rationing breast reduction surgery.
BMJ. 1997 Apr 5;314(7086):1045-6.
6
The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1593-601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593.
7
Rationing health care: the political perspective.
Br Med Bull. 1995 Oct;51(4):876-84. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a073002.
8
Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationing.
BMJ. 1995 Jun 24;310(6995):1655-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6995.1655.
9
Rationing health care.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Jul 21;289(6438):143-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6438.143.
10
Rationing: the search for sunlight.
BMJ. 1991;303(6817):1561-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6817.1561.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验