Suppr超能文献

CHOP方案与CHOP联合ESHAP方案以及高剂量疗法联合自体外周血祖细胞移植治疗高中危和高危侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较

CHOP versus CHOP plus ESHAP and high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for high-intermediate-risk and high-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

作者信息

Intragumtornchai T, Prayoonwiwat W, Numbenjapon T, Assawametha N, O'Charoen R, Swasdikul D

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma. 2000 Dec;1(3):219-25. doi: 10.3816/clm.2000.n.018.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare conventional cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisolone (CHOP) chemotherapy with CHOP (3 courses) plus etoposide/methylprednisolone/high-dose cytarabine/cisplatin (ESHAP), high-dose therapy (HDT), and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) as front-line treatment for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Between May 1, 1995, and April 30, 1998, 58 patients, aged 15-55 years, newly diagnosed with poor-prognosis aggressive NHL (category F-H by the Working Formulation) were enrolled. According to the age-adjusted international prognostic index, 65% of the patients were high-risk cases and 35% made up the high-intermediate group. After 3 courses of CHOP, 25 of 48 patients were randomized to continue with CHOP, and 23 were randomized to receive 2-4 cycles of ESHAP followed by HDT and PBPCT. There was no significant difference in the rate of complete remission between the two groups (36%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 18%-57% in CHOP vs. 43%, 95% CI: 23%-65% in ESHAP/HDT) (P = 0.77). With a median follow-up duration of 39 months, the 4-year failure-free survival (FFS) was superior in the ESHAP/HDT group (38%, 95% CI: 18%-58% vs. 15%, 95% CI: 4%-32%) (P = 0.04). The disease-free survival was marginally different in favor of the ESHAP/HDT arm (90%, 95% CI: 47%-98% vs. 37%, 95% CI: 7%-69%) (P = 0.06). The 4-year overall survival between the two treatment arms was comparable (51%, 95% CI: 28%-70% for ESHAP/HDT vs. 30%, 95% CI: 13%-48% for CHOP) (P = 0.25). Treatment-related mortalities were not significantly different between both groups (17%, 95% CI: 5%-39% for ESHAP/HDT vs. 8%, 95% CI: 1%-26% for CHOP) (P = 0.41). However, only 61% of the patients assigned to the ESHAP/HDT arm underwent HDT and PBPCT. As compared with CHOP, the corporate regimen of CHOP/ESHAP/HDT seems to improve the FFS in patients with newly diagnosed, poor-prognosis aggressive NHL.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较传统的环磷酰胺/阿霉素/长春新碱/泼尼松(CHOP)化疗与CHOP(3个疗程)加依托泊苷/甲泼尼龙/大剂量阿糖胞苷/顺铂(ESHAP)、大剂量疗法(HDT)以及自体外周血祖细胞移植(PBPCT)作为预后不良的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)一线治疗方案的疗效。在1995年5月1日至1998年4月30日期间,纳入了58例年龄在15至55岁之间、新诊断为预后不良的侵袭性NHL(根据工作分类法为F-H类)的患者。根据年龄调整后的国际预后指数,65%的患者为高危病例,35%为高中间组。在接受3个疗程的CHOP治疗后,48例患者中的25例被随机分配继续接受CHOP治疗,23例被随机分配接受2至4个周期的ESHAP治疗,随后进行HDT和PBPCT。两组的完全缓解率无显著差异(CHOP组为36%,95%置信区间[CI]:18%-57%;ESHAP/HDT组为43%,95%CI:23%-65%)(P = 0.77)。中位随访时间为39个月,ESHAP/HDT组的4年无失败生存率(FFS)更高(38%,95%CI:18%-58% vs. 15%,95%CI:4%-32%)(P = 0.04)。无病生存率在ESHAP/HDT组略占优势(90%,95%CI:47%-98% vs. 37%,95%CI:7%-69%)(P = 0.06)。两个治疗组的4年总生存率相当(ESHAP/HDT组为51%,95%CI:28%-70%;CHOP组为30%,95%CI:13%-48%)(P = 0.25)。两组的治疗相关死亡率无显著差异(ESHAP/HDT组为17%,95%CI:5%-39%;CHOP组为8%,95%CI:1%-26%)(P = 0.41)。然而,分配到ESHAP/HDT组的患者中只有61%接受了HDT和PBPCT。与CHOP相比,CHOP/ESHAP/HDT联合方案似乎能改善新诊断的、预后不良的侵袭性NHL患者的FFS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验