Suppr超能文献

大剂量化疗联合自体干细胞移植用于成人侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的一线治疗。

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the first line treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in adults.

作者信息

Greb A, Bohlius J, Schiefer D, Schwarzer G, Schulz H, Engert A

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD004024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004024.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (HDT) has been proven effective in relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, conflicting results of HDT as part of first-line treatment have been reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of such treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation as part of first-line treatment improves survival in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancer Lit, the Cochrane Library and smaller databases, Internet-databases of ongoing trials, conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology were searched. We included full-text, abstract publications and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing conventional chemotherapy versus high-dose chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eligibility and quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were done in duplicate. All authors were contacted to obtain missing data and asked to provide individual patient data.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs including 3079 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Overall treatment-related mortality was 6.0% in the HDT group and not significantly different compared to conventional chemotherapy (OR 1.33 [95% CI 0.91 to 1.93], P=0.14). 13 studies including 2018 patients showed significantly higher CR rates in the group receiving HDT (OR 1.32, [95% CI 1.09 to 1.59], P=0.004). However, HDT did not have an effect on OS, when compared to conventional chemotherapy. The pooled HR was 1.04 ([95% CI 0.91 to 1.18], P=0.58). There was no statistical heterogeneity among the trials. Sensitivity analyses underlined the robustness of these results. Subgroup analysis of prognostic groups according to IPI did not show any survival difference between HDT and controls in 12 trials (low and low-intermediate risk IPI: HR 1.41[95% CI 0.95 to 2.10], P=0.09; high-intermediate and high risk IPI: HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.83 to 1.13], P=0.71. Event-free survival (EFS) also showed no significant difference between HDT and CT (HR 0.93, [95% CI 0.81 to 1.07], P=0.31). Other possible risk factors such as the proportion of patient with diffuse large cell lymphoma, protocol adherence, HDT strategy, response status before HDT, conditioning regimens and methodological issues were analysed in sensitivity analyses. However, there was no evidence for an association between these factors and the results of our analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: . Despite higher CR rates, there is no benefit for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation as a first line treatment in patients with aggressive NHL.

摘要

背景

高剂量化疗联合自体干细胞支持(HDT)已被证明对复发的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)有效。然而,随机对照试验(RCT)报道了HDT作为一线治疗的结果相互矛盾。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析以评估这种治疗的效果。

目的

确定作为一线治疗的一部分,高剂量化疗联合自体干细胞移植是否能提高侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的生存率。

检索策略

检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、癌症文献数据库、Cochrane图书馆和较小的数据库、正在进行试验的互联网数据库、美国临床肿瘤学会和美国血液学会的会议论文集。我们纳入了全文、摘要出版物和未发表的数据。

选择标准

本综述纳入了在成人侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤一线治疗中比较传统化疗与高剂量化疗的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

资格和质量评估、数据提取和分析均重复进行。联系了所有作者以获取缺失数据,并要求提供个体患者数据。

主要结果

15项RCT(包括3079例患者)符合本荟萃分析的条件。HDT组总的治疗相关死亡率为6.0%,与传统化疗相比无显著差异(比值比1.33[95%可信区间0.91至1.93],P = 0.14)。13项研究(包括2018例患者)显示接受HDT组的完全缓解率显著更高(比值比1.32,[95%可信区间1.09至1.59],P = 0.004)。然而,与传统化疗相比,HDT对总生存期没有影响。汇总的风险比为1.04([95%可信区间0.91至1.18],P = 0.58)。各试验之间无统计学异质性。敏感性分析强调了这些结果的稳健性。根据国际预后指数(IPI)对预后组进行的亚组分析在12项试验中未显示HDT与对照组之间存在任何生存差异(低和低中危IPI:风险比1.41[95%可信区间0.95至2.10],P = 0.09;高中危和高危IPI:风险比0.97 [95%可信区间0.83至1.13],P = 0.71)。无事件生存期(EFS)在HDT组和传统化疗组之间也无显著差异(风险比0.93,[95%可信区间0.81至1.07],P = 0.31)。在敏感性分析中分析了其他可能的风险因素,如弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤患者的比例、方案依从性、HDT策略、HDT前的缓解状态、预处理方案和方法学问题。然而,没有证据表明这些因素与我们的分析结果之间存在关联。

作者结论

尽管完全缓解率较高,但对于侵袭性NHL患者,高剂量化疗联合干细胞移植作为一线治疗并无益处。

相似文献

4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.晚期胃癌的化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 29;8(8):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4.

引用本文的文献

8
Relevance on the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma of the salivary gland.对涎腺恶性淋巴瘤诊断的相关性。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Jul 6;8(13):2717-2726. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i13.2717.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验