Jabbour E, Peslin N, Arnaud P, Ferme C, Carde P, Vantelon J M, Bocaccio C, Bourhis J H, Koscielny S, Ribrag V
Département de Médecine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Leuk Lymphoma. 2005 Jun;46(6):861-7. doi: 10.1080/10428190500054350.
High-dose therapy (HDT) is now recommended for patients under 60 years of age with chemosensitive relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, approximately half of these patients will be cured by HDT. Prognostic factors are needed to predict which patients with chemosensitive lymphoma to second-line therapy could benefit from HDT. We retrospectively investigated the prognostic value of the widely used age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (AA-IPI) calculated at the time of relapse (35 patients) or just before second-line salvage therapy for primary refractory disease (5 patients). The median age was 51 years (range 18-64 years). Thirty-six patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Salvage cytoreductive therapy before HDT was DHAP/ESHAP (cytarabine, cysplatin, etoposide, steroids) in 17 patients, VIM3-Ara-c/MAMI (high-dose cytarabine, ifosfamide, methyl-gag, amsacrine) in 17 patients, CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) or reinforced CHOP in 4 patients, high-dose cyclophosphamide and etoposide in 2 patients. The HDT regimen consisted of BEAM (carmusine, cytarabine, etoposide, melphalan) in all cases. Eleven patients were in partial remission and 29 in complete remission at the time of HDT. Ten patients had an IPI >1, 16 had relapsed early (<6 months after first-line therapy) or disease was refractory to first-line therapy (5 of the 16 patients). The median follow-up was 6.07 years (range 1.24-9.74 years). Overall survival was not statistically different in patients with refractory disease or in those who relapsed early compared with late failures (>6 months after first-line chemotherapy) (P=1), but the AA-IPI >1 was associated with a poor outcome (P=0.03). In conclusion, the AA-IPI could have a prognostic value in patients with chemosensitive recurrent lymphoma treated with BEAM HDT.
目前,对于60岁以下化疗敏感的复发性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,推荐采用大剂量疗法(HDT)。然而,这些患者中约有一半将通过HDT治愈。需要预后因素来预测哪些对二线治疗敏感的淋巴瘤患者能从HDT中获益。我们回顾性研究了复发时(35例患者)或原发性难治性疾病二线挽救治疗前(5例患者)计算的广泛使用的年龄校正国际预后指数(AA-IPI)的预后价值。中位年龄为51岁(范围18 - 64岁)。36例患者患有弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤。HDT前的挽救性细胞减灭治疗中,17例患者采用DHAP/ESHAP(阿糖胞苷、顺铂、依托泊苷、类固醇),17例患者采用VIM3 - Ara - c/MAMI(大剂量阿糖胞苷、异环磷酰胺、甲基苄肼、安吖啶),4例患者采用CHOP(环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松)或强化CHOP,2例患者采用大剂量环磷酰胺和依托泊苷。所有病例的HDT方案均为BEAM(卡莫司汀、阿糖胞苷、依托泊苷、美法仑)。HDT时,11例患者部分缓解,29例患者完全缓解。10例患者的IPI>1,16例患者早期复发(一线治疗后<6个月)或疾病对一线治疗耐药(16例患者中的5例)。中位随访时间为6.07年(范围1.24 - 9.74年)。难治性疾病患者或早期复发患者与晚期复发患者(一线化疗后>6个月)的总生存期无统计学差异(P = 1),但AA-IPI>1与不良预后相关(P = 0.03)。总之,AA-IPI对于接受BEAM HDT治疗的化疗敏感复发性淋巴瘤患者可能具有预后价值。