Luckinbill L S, Foley P
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Biogerontology. 2000;1(1):3-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1010033807151.
Two approaches to the study of aging are contrasted. The results and implications of the gene-by-gene, hypothetico-deductive molecular genetic approach are compared with studies engendered by unique empirical findings. The former hypothesis-testing approach examines the changing phenotype that results from alterations of the genome and measures the relevance of a gene by the effectiveness with which it alters life-span. Investigations of empirical demographic and physiological puzzles that have come to light in aging studies, examine these phenomena for the broader understanding they bring rather than the knowledge of specific causative genetic elements. While the former hypothesis testing method requires caution in interpretation of results and conclusions, it has been highly informative. Studies of empirical phenomena have necessarily progressed more slowly, but have also yielded substantial gains. Both approaches have advanced the understanding of the aging process from distinctly different but complementary viewpoints.
两种衰老研究方法形成了对比。将逐个基因的、假设演绎的分子遗传学方法的结果及影响,与由独特实证发现所引发的研究进行了比较。前一种假设检验方法研究基因组改变所导致的变化表型,并通过基因改变寿命的有效性来衡量其相关性。对衰老研究中出现的实证性人口统计学和生理学谜题的调查,考察这些现象是为了获得更广泛的理解,而非特定致病基因元件的知识。虽然前一种假设检验方法在结果和结论的解释上需要谨慎,但它提供了大量信息。对实证现象的研究进展必然较慢,但也取得了显著成果。两种方法都从截然不同但又相互补充的视角推进了对衰老过程的理解。