Lefrandt J D, Heitmann J, Sevre K, Castellano M, Hausberg M, Fallon M, Fluckiger L, Urbigkeit A, Rostrup M, Agabiti-Rosei E, Rahn K H, Murphy M, Zannad F, de Kam P J, van Roon A M, Smit A J
University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Am J Hypertens. 2001 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):1083-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(01)02218-x.
The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of a long-acting dihydropyridine (amlodipine) and a nondihydropyridine (verapamil) on autonomic function in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. A total of 145 patients with a diastolic blood pressure (BP) between 95 and 110 mm Hg received 8 weeks of verapamil sustained release (240 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) in a prospective randomized, double blind, cross-over study, both after 4 weeks of placebo. The 24-h autonomic balance was measured by analysis of 24-h heart rate variability and short-term autonomic control of BP by baroreflex sensitivity measurements. Plasma norepinephrine was sampled at rest. Blood pressure was equally reduced from 153/100 mm Hg to 139/91 mm Hg with verapamil and 138/91 mm Hg with amlodipine, P = .50/.59. The low- to high-frequency ratio (LF/HF), reflecting sympathovagal balance, was higher with amlodipine than with verapamil (4.66 v 4.10; P = .001). Baroreflex function was improved by both treatments; however, baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was significantly higher with verapamil than with amlodipine (8.47 v 8.06 msec/mm Hg; P = .01). Plasma norepinephrine (NE) level was higher with amlodipine than with verapamil (1.59 v 1.32 nmol/L; P < .0001). Amlodipine induces a shift in sympathovagal balance, as measured by heart rate variability indices and plasma NE, toward sympathetic predominance compared with vagal predominance with verapamil. Short-term autonomic control of BP, as assessed by BRS, is more effectively improved by verapamil than by amlodipine. These contrasting effects on autonomic function suggest that the nondihydropyridine calcium antagonist verapamil may have additional beneficial effects beyond lowering BP compared with the dihydropyridine amlodipine.
本研究的目的是比较长效二氢吡啶类(氨氯地平)和非二氢吡啶类(维拉帕米)对轻至中度高血压患者自主神经功能的影响。在一项前瞻性随机、双盲、交叉研究中,共有145例舒张压(BP)在95至110mmHg之间的患者,在服用4周安慰剂后,接受8周的维拉帕米缓释片(240mg)和氨氯地平(5mg)治疗。通过分析24小时心率变异性来测量24小时自主神经平衡,并通过压力反射敏感性测量来评估血压的短期自主控制。静息时采集血浆去甲肾上腺素。维拉帕米和氨氯地平均使血压从153/100mmHg降至139/91mmHg和138/91mmHg,P值分别为0.50/0.59。反映交感迷走神经平衡的低频与高频比值(LF/HF),氨氯地平高于维拉帕米(4.66对4.10;P = 0.001)。两种治疗均改善了压力反射功能;然而,维拉帕米的压力反射敏感性(BRS)显著高于氨氯地平(8.47对8.06msec/mm Hg;P = 0.01)。氨氯地平组的血浆去甲肾上腺素(NE)水平高于维拉帕米组(1.59对1.32nmol/L;P < 0.0001)。与维拉帕米以迷走神经占优势相比,通过心率变异性指标和血浆NE测量,氨氯地平导致交感迷走神经平衡向交感神经占优势转变。通过BRS评估,维拉帕米比氨氯地平更有效地改善血压的短期自主控制。这些对自主神经功能的不同影响表明,与二氢吡啶类氨氯地平相比,非二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂维拉帕米除了降低血压外可能还有其他有益作用。