Eguchi Kazuo, Tomizawa Hidenori, Ishikawa Joji, Hoshide Satoshi, Fukuda Toshio, Numao Toshio, Shimada Kazuyuki, Kario Kazuomi
Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007 Jun;49(6):394-400. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31804d1cf1.
The effect of dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) on baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is not well described. We studied the effect of a new CCB, azelnidipine, compared with amlodipine, on BRS and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in newly diagnosed untreated hypertension. This study was a prospective, randomized, and open-label study. We randomized patients to either azelnidipine or amlodipine treatment. Azelnidipine 8 to 16 mg (average 14.5 mg) and amlodipine 2.5 to 7.5 mg (average 4.9 mg) were used to lower the clinical BP <140/90 mm Hg. BRS, evaluated by the spontaneous and the Valsalva methods, and clinical and ambulatory BP were evaluated at baseline and after 13 weeks of each treatment. A total of 47 patients (age 53.1 +/- 10.8 years, 51% male), 26 in the azelnidipine group and 21 in the amlodipine group, completed the study. For baseline and after therapy respectively, both Valsalva-BRS (4.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 8.4 +/- 3.1 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.001) and spontaneous-BRS (5.5 +/- 2.5 vs. 8.2 +/- 5.6 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.019) were increased by azelnidipine, but amlodipine did not change them. Clinical and awake BPs were similarly reduced by each drug therapy. In conclusion, BRS was increased by azelnidipine therapy, but not by amlodipine therapy. This differential effect may be important in cardiovascular risk reduction.
二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)对压力反射敏感性(BRS)的影响尚未得到充分描述。我们研究了一种新型CCB阿折地平与氨氯地平相比,对新诊断未经治疗的高血压患者BRS和动态血压(BP)的影响。本研究为前瞻性、随机、开放标签研究。我们将患者随机分为阿折地平组或氨氯地平组进行治疗。使用阿折地平8至16毫克(平均14.5毫克)和氨氯地平2.5至7.5毫克(平均4.9毫克)将临床血压降至<140/90毫米汞柱。通过自发性和瓦尔萨尔瓦方法评估BRS,并在每种治疗的基线和13周后评估临床和动态血压。共有47例患者(年龄53.1±10.8岁,男性占51%)完成了研究,其中阿折地平组26例,氨氯地平组21例。分别在基线和治疗后,阿折地平可使瓦尔萨尔瓦-BRS(4.8±1.7对8.4±3.1毫秒/毫米汞柱,P=0.001)和自发性-BRS(5.5±2.5对8.2±5.6毫秒/毫米汞柱,P=0.019)均升高,但氨氯地平对其无影响。每种药物治疗均可使临床和清醒时血压同样降低。总之,阿折地平治疗可增加BRS,而氨氯地平治疗则不能。这种差异效应在降低心血管风险方面可能很重要。