Hagmar L, Strömberg U, Tinnerberg H, Mikoczy Z
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2001 Oct;204(1):43-7. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00071.
During the last decades, cytogenetic biomarkers in peripheral lymphocytes have been used to assess exposure to carcinogenic or mutagenic agents in occupational settings. The first method in use assessed chromosomal aberrations (CA). It is generally accepted that chromosomal mutations are causal events in the development of neoplasia, and it has earlier been postulated, but not proven, that increased chromosomal damage may reflect an enhanced cancer risk. Two less laborious techniques, sister chromatoid exchanges (SCE) and micronuclei (MN), were introduced later-on in occupational health surveillances. SCE represent symmetrical exchanges between sister chromatids; generally they do not result in alteration of the chromosome morphology. MN represent small, additional nuclei formed by the exclusion of chromosome fragments or whole chromosomes lagging at mitosis. MN rates therefore indirectly reflect chromosome breakage or impairment of the mitotic apparatus. The health significance of increased levels of SCE and MN is poorly understood. The usefulness of these cytogenetic techniques for implementing preventive measures in the workplaces depend on how well they serve as biomarkers of exposure but also on whether they can predict cancer risk or not. Recently performed epidemiological studies show that the CA frequency predicts the overall cancer risk in healthy subjects. Such associations could not been seen for SCE or MN. Age, sex, or time since test did not affect the predictive value of CA. This predictivity was seen irrespective of whether the subjects had been smokers or occupationally exposed to carcinogenic agents. Risk factors such as age, smoking and occupational exposures usually explain only some of the interindividual variation in CA frequency. It seems reasonable that not yet identified individual susceptibility factors explain a large fraction of the interindividual CA variation and also the cancer predictivity of the CA biomarker.
在过去几十年里,外周血淋巴细胞中的细胞遗传学生物标志物已被用于评估职业环境中致癌或致突变剂的暴露情况。最初使用的方法是评估染色体畸变(CA)。人们普遍认为染色体突变是肿瘤发生发展中的因果事件,并且此前曾有人推测,但未得到证实,即染色体损伤增加可能反映癌症风险的增加。后来在职业健康监测中引入了另外两种不太费力的技术,即姐妹染色单体交换(SCE)和微核(MN)。SCE代表姐妹染色单体之间的对称交换;通常它们不会导致染色体形态的改变。MN代表在有丝分裂时由于染色体片段或整条染色体滞后而形成的小的额外细胞核。因此,MN率间接反映染色体断裂或有丝分裂装置的损伤。人们对SCE和MN水平升高的健康意义了解甚少。这些细胞遗传学技术在工作场所实施预防措施的有用性不仅取决于它们作为暴露生物标志物的效果,还取决于它们是否能够预测癌症风险。最近进行的流行病学研究表明,CA频率可预测健康受试者的总体癌症风险。而对于SCE或MN则未观察到这种关联。年龄、性别或检测后的时间并未影响CA的预测价值。无论受试者是吸烟者还是职业性接触致癌剂,这种预测性都存在。年龄、吸烟和职业暴露等风险因素通常只能解释CA频率个体间差异的一部分。尚未确定的个体易感性因素可能解释了个体间CA差异的很大一部分以及CA生物标志物的癌症预测性,这似乎是合理的。