Suppr超能文献

医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD):大样本群体中的因子结构、项目分析及内部一致性

Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale: factor structure, item analyses and internal consistency in a large population.

作者信息

Mykletun A, Stordal E, Dahl A A

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;179:540-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.179.6.540.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) rating scale is a commonly used questionnaire. Former studies have given inconsistent results as to the psychometric properties of the HAD scale.

AIMS

To examine the psychometric properties of the HAD scale in a large population.

METHOD

All inhabitants aged 20-89 years (n=92 100) were invited to take part in The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, Norway. A total of 65 648 subjects participated, and only completed HAD scale forms (n=51 930) formed the basis for the psychometric examinations.

RESULTS

Principal component analysis extracted two factors in the HAD scale that accounted for 57% of the variance. The anxiety and depression sub-scales shared 30% of the variance. Both subscales were found to be internally consistent, with values of Cronbach's coefficient (alpha) being 0.80 and 0.76, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on data from a large population, the basic psychometric properties of the HAD scale as a self-rating instrument should be considered as quite good in terms of factor structure, intercorrelation, homogeneity and internal consistency.

摘要

背景

医院焦虑抑郁(HAD)评定量表是一种常用问卷。以往研究关于HAD量表的心理测量特性给出了不一致的结果。

目的

在大量人群中检验HAD量表的心理测量特性。

方法

邀请挪威诺尔兰郡所有20 - 89岁居民(n = 92100)参与诺尔兰郡健康研究。共有65648名受试者参与,只有完整的HAD量表表格(n = 51930)构成心理测量检验的基础。

结果

主成分分析在HAD量表中提取出两个因子,它们解释了57%的方差。焦虑和抑郁子量表共享30%的方差。两个子量表均具有内部一致性,克朗巴赫系数(α)值分别为0.80和0.76。

结论

基于大量人群的数据,HAD量表作为一种自评工具,在因子结构、相互关联、同质性和内部一致性方面的基本心理测量特性应被认为相当良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验