损伤、残疾和障碍——过时的概念？
Impairment, disability and handicap--old fashioned concepts?
作者信息
Jones R B
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2001 Dec;27(6):377-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.6.377.
Abstract
The drawbacks of using the concepts of models in discussing the problems of disabled people are discussed. It is suggested that the terms "impairment", "disability", and "handicap" can unify the different models and enhance the position of people with disabilities in society.
摘要
讨论了在探讨残疾人问题时使用模型概念的弊端。有人认为，“损伤”“残疾”和“障碍”这些术语可以统一不同的模型，并提升残疾人在社会中的地位。
相似文献
1
Impairment, disability and handicap--old fashioned concepts?损伤、残疾和障碍——过时的概念？
J Med Ethics. 2001 Dec;27(6):377-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.6.377.
2
Disease, illness, sickness; impairment, disability and handicap.疾病、病患、病症；损伤、残疾和障碍。
Psychol Med. 1990 Aug;20(3):471-3. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700016974.
3
Reflection on the definition of impairment and disability as defined by the World Health Organization.对世界卫生组织所定义的损伤和残疾的反思。
Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Apr-Jun;17(3-4):119-27. doi: 10.3109/09638289509166706.
4
Dismantling the disability/handicap distinction.
J Med Philos. 1997 Dec;22(6):589-606. doi: 10.1093/jmp/22.6.589.
5
The importance of a disability/handicap distinction.残疾与残障区分的重要性。
J Med Philos. 1997 Dec;22(6):607-22. doi: 10.1093/jmp/22.6.607.
6
An introduction to the concepts and classifications of the international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps.《国际损伤、残疾和残障分类》的概念与分类介绍。
Disabil Rehabil. 1993 Oct-Dec;15(4):161-78. doi: 10.3109/09638289309166008.
7
A note on the theoretical framework of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II.关于世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版理论框架的说明
Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):687-91. doi: 10.3109/09638280903290012.
8
[ICF classification of disabilities in common disease conditions. An international development work].[常见疾病状况下残疾的国际功能、残疾和健康分类。一项国际开发工作]
Lakartidningen. 2005;102(37):2556-9.
9
The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH)--results and problems.《国际损伤、残疾和残障分类》（ICIDH）——结果与问题
Int J Rehabil Res. 1996 Mar;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199603000-00001.
10
A framework for human functioning-the ICF in Australia.人类功能框架——澳大利亚的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》
Health Inf Manag. 2004;33(4):134-6. doi: 10.1177/183335830403300406.
引用本文的文献
1
Application of Disease Etiology and Natural History to Prevention in Primary Health Care: A Discourse.疾病病因学和自然史在初级卫生保健预防中的应用：论述。
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(6):501-513. doi: 10.1159/000508718. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children.催化作用：一项多国多学科德尔菲共识研究。识别儿童语言障碍。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158753. eCollection 2016.
3
One principle and three fallacies of disability studies.残疾研究的一个原则与三个谬误。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Dec;27(6):383-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.6.383.
本文引用的文献
1
Parental consent to cosmetic facial surgery in Down's syndrome.唐氏综合征患儿面部整形手术的家长同意书。
J Med Ethics. 2000 Apr;26(2):101-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.2.101.
2
Is there a coherent social conception of disability?是否存在关于残疾的连贯的社会概念？
J Med Ethics. 2000 Apr;26(2):95-100. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.2.95.
3
Disability, gene therapy and eugenics--a challenge to John Harris.残疾、基因治疗与优生学——对约翰·哈里斯的挑战
J Med Ethics. 2000 Apr;26(2):89-94. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.2.89.
4
Plastic surgical management of children with Down's syndrome: indications and results.唐氏综合征患儿的整形外科治疗：适应症与结果
Br J Plast Surg. 1982 Apr;35(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(82)90163-1.
5
The old beliefs and the cerebral palsied.旧观念与脑瘫患者
Rehabil Rec. 1968 Sep-Oct;9(5):16-21.
6
Health.健康。
J Med Ethics. 1986 Dec;12(4):174-81. doi: 10.1136/jme.12.4.174.
7
Parents' and physicians' perceptions of facial plastic surgery in children with Down's syndrome.父母和医生对唐氏综合征患儿面部整形手术的看法。
J Ment Defic Res. 1986 Mar;30 ( Pt 1):71-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1986.tb01299.x.
Zotero 插件