Scarfone R J, Zorc J J, Capraro G A
Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Pediatrics. 2001 Dec;108(6):1332-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.6.1332.
Children in the emergency department (ED) with acute asthma were enrolled to assess the impact of asthma on their activities of daily living and evaluate their access to care and preventive strategies, determine the proportion who adhered to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines for proper steps to take at home during an acute asthma exacerbation, and compare adherence rates for those with persistent and mild intermittent asthma.
Children 2 to 18 years old who presented to the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's ED with acute asthma exacerbations were enrolled prospectively. Parents and patients completed the 108-item Asthma Exacerbation Response Questionnaire with a focus on determining the home management steps they took both at the onset of the asthma exacerbation and just before coming to the ED.
Among the 433 children studied, 76% had at least 1 doctor visit, 75% had at least 1 ED visit, and 43% had at least 1 hospitalization for asthma in the preceding 12 months. Overall, 64% had persistent asthma by NHLBI criteria, yet just 4% were cared for by an allergist or pulmonologist, 38% took daily anti-inflammatory therapy, and 18% received a daily inhaled corticosteroid. Also, 48% did not use a holding chamber with their metered-dose inhalers, and 66% did not use their peak flow meters. Regarding exacerbation response, 71% did not have a written action plan, and 89% did not maintain a symptom diary. Both at the onset of wheezing and just before coming to the ED, administration of a beta2-agonist was the only step that the majority of children performed. One-third or fewer followed the other steps recommended by the NHLBI, including using a peak flow meter, beginning oral corticosteroids, calling or going to see the doctor, or going to the ED. Children with persistent asthma were not more adherent to the guidelines than those with mild intermittent disease.
Asthma has a significant adverse effect on the lives of these children. The NHLBI guidelines, first published a decade ago, were designed to reduce asthma's increasing morbidity and mortality, but this study uncovered a high rate of nonadherence with many aspects of the guidelines, including preventive strategies and home management of an exacerbation.
招募急诊科患有急性哮喘的儿童,以评估哮喘对其日常生活活动的影响,评估他们获得护理和预防策略的情况,确定在急性哮喘发作期间遵守美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)关于在家中采取正确措施指南的儿童比例,并比较持续性哮喘和轻度间歇性哮喘儿童的依从率。
前瞻性招募到费城儿童医院急诊科就诊的2至18岁患有急性哮喘加重的儿童。家长和患儿完成了108项哮喘加重反应问卷,重点是确定他们在哮喘加重发作时以及前来急诊科之前采取的家庭管理措施。
在研究的433名儿童中,76%的儿童在过去12个月中至少看了1次医生,75%至少去过1次急诊科,43%至少因哮喘住院1次。总体而言,根据NHLBI标准,64%的儿童患有持续性哮喘,但只有4%由过敏症专科医生或肺科医生诊治,38%接受每日抗炎治疗,18%接受每日吸入性糖皮质激素治疗。此外,48%的儿童在使用定量吸入器时未使用储物罐,66%未使用峰流速仪。关于加重反应,71%的儿童没有书面行动计划,89%没有记录症状日记。在喘息发作时和前来急诊科之前,大多数儿童采取的唯一措施是使用β2激动剂。只有三分之一或更少的儿童遵循了NHLBI推荐的其他措施,包括使用峰流速仪、开始口服糖皮质激素、打电话或去看医生,或前往急诊科。持续性哮喘儿童并不比轻度间歇性疾病儿童更遵守指南。
哮喘对这些儿童的生活有重大不利影响。NHLBI指南于十年前首次发布,旨在降低哮喘不断上升的发病率和死亡率,但本研究发现,在指南的许多方面,包括预防策略和加重发作的家庭管理,不依从率很高。