• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在联邦合格健康中心接受治疗的患者中,哮喘药物的可及性和使用情况。

Access and Utilization of Asthma Medications Among Patients Who Receive Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221101202. doi: 10.1177/21501319221101202.

DOI:10.1177/21501319221101202
PMID:35603467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9130805/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe access to and use of prescription asthma medications, and to assess factors associated with asthma exacerbation, healthcare utilization, and health status among asthma patients treated at Federally Qualified Health Centers.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. We analyzed data from the 2014 National Health Center Patient Survey. This data is publicly available from the Health Resources and Services Administration. Data was collected from patients receiving face-to-face care from health centers funded under Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act. Data from patients was collected between October 8, 2014, and April 17, 2015. We included adult participants who reported having a diagnosis of asthma and confirmed that they still have asthma. Association between explanatory variables (access to prescription medications and use of asthma controller medications) and outcome variables (asthma exacerbations, asthma hospitalizations or emergency department visits, and self-rated health) was assessed using multivariable regression analyses while adjusting for demographics.

RESULTS

A total of 919 participants with asthma were included. Approximately 32% of the participants experienced delays in getting prescription medications, 26% were unable to get them, 60% experienced an asthma exacerbation last year, 48% rated their health as fair/poor, and 19% visited a hospital or an emergency department last year. Multivariable results showed that participants who were currently taking controller medications were more likely to have experienced an asthma exacerbation (OR = 4.02; 95% CI 1.91 to 8.45;  < .01), or visited a hospital or an emergency department (OR = 3.07; 95% CI 1.39 to 6.73;  < .01) in the last year compared with those who had never taken controller medications. Experiencing difficulties in accessing asthma medications was associated with lower self-rated health ( = -.51; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.08;  = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Future interventions should seek to improve asthma patient care and health outcomes using innovative strategies that act at multiple levels of the healthcare system (eg, individual, interpersonal, community levels).

摘要

目的

描述处方哮喘药物的可及性和使用情况,并评估在接受联邦合格健康中心治疗的哮喘患者中,与哮喘恶化、医疗保健利用和健康状况相关的因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性的横断面研究。我们分析了 2014 年国家医疗中心患者调查的数据。这些数据由公共卫生服务法案第 330 节资助的医疗中心的面对面护理患者提供,可从健康资源和服务管理局获得。数据于 2014 年 10 月 8 日至 2015 年 4 月 17 日期间收集。我们纳入了报告有哮喘诊断并确认仍患有哮喘的成年参与者。使用多变量回归分析评估解释变量(获得处方药物和使用哮喘控制药物)与结果变量(哮喘恶化、哮喘住院或急诊就诊和自我报告的健康状况)之间的关联,同时调整人口统计学因素。

结果

共纳入 919 名哮喘患者。约 32%的参与者在获得处方药物时出现延迟,26%无法获得药物,60%的参与者去年经历了哮喘恶化,48%的参与者自我报告健康状况为一般/较差,19%的参与者去年去过医院或急诊室。多变量结果显示,目前正在服用控制药物的参与者更有可能在过去一年中经历哮喘恶化(比值比[OR] = 4.02;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.91 至 8.45; < .01)或去过医院或急诊室(OR = 3.07;95% CI 1.39 至 6.73; < .01)。在获得哮喘药物方面遇到困难与自我报告的健康状况较差相关( = −0.51;95% CI−0.94 至−0.08; = .02)。

结论

未来的干预措施应寻求使用创新策略来改善哮喘患者的护理和健康结果,这些策略可在医疗保健系统的多个层面(例如,个人、人际和社区层面)发挥作用。

相似文献

1
Access and Utilization of Asthma Medications Among Patients Who Receive Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers.在联邦合格健康中心接受治疗的患者中,哮喘药物的可及性和使用情况。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221101202. doi: 10.1177/21501319221101202.
2
Evaluation of asthma medication adherence rates and strategies to improve adherence in the underserved population at a Federally Qualified Health Center.在一家联邦合格健康中心对哮喘药物依从率及改善弱势群体依从性的策略进行评估。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jul-Aug;13(4):759-766. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
3
Barriers Associated with Access to Prescription Medications in Patients Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated at Federally Qualified Health Centers.在联邦合格医疗中心接受治疗的2型糖尿病患者获取处方药的相关障碍。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Jul 8;10(4):79. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10040079.
4
Follow-up to a federally qualified health center and subsequent emergency department utilization.在联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)就诊后的后续利用情况,以及后续对急诊部门的利用情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;17(1):55-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00621.x.
5
Connecting Patients to Prescription Assistance Programs: Effects on Emergency Department and Hospital Utilization.将患者与处方援助计划相连接:对急诊部门和医院利用的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Apr;22(4):381-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.4.381.
6
Utilization of health care services among Medicare beneficiaries who visit federally qualified health centers.在就诊于联邦合格健康中心的医疗保险受益人中医疗保健服务的利用情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2847-x.
7
Asthma Controller Medication Adherence, Risk of Exacerbation, and Use of Rescue Agents Among Texas Medicaid Patients with Persistent Asthma.德克萨斯州 Medicaid 计划中持续性哮喘患者的哮喘控制药物治疗依从性、恶化风险和急救药物使用情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1124-32. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1124.
8
9
Evaluation of asthma prescription measures and health system performance based on emergency department utilization.基于急诊科利用情况的哮喘处方措施与卫生系统绩效评估
Med Care. 2004 May;42(5):465-71. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000124249.84045.d7.
10
The impact of funding for federally qualified health centers on utilization and emergency department visits in Massachusetts.联邦合格健康中心资金对马萨诸塞州利用情况和急诊就诊的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243279. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing Asthma in Adolescents and Adults: 2020 Asthma Guideline Update From the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program.青少年和成人哮喘管理:国家哮喘教育和预防计划 2020 年哮喘指南更新。
JAMA. 2020 Dec 8;324(22):2301-2317. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21974.
2
Association of Patient-Centered Medical Home designation and quality indicators within HRSA-funded community health center delivery sites.患者为中心的医疗之家指定与 HRSA 资助的社区卫生中心服务点内的质量指标之间的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):980. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05826-x.
3
Community Health Centers Primary Care Physicians' Asthma Management Perception of Uninsured Patients.社区卫生中心初级保健医生对未参保患者哮喘管理的认知
Prof Case Manag. 2020 Nov/Dec;25(6):335-342. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000406.
4
Extent, trends, and determinants of controller/reliever balance in mild asthma: a 14-year population-based study.轻中度哮喘中控制器/缓解药物平衡的范围、趋势和决定因素:一项为期 14 年的基于人群的研究。
Respir Res. 2019 Feb 28;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1007-0.
5
Attitudes, Beliefs, and Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence Among Adults Aged 65 or Older With Chronic Diseases.65 岁及以上患有慢性病的成年人的态度、信念和与费用相关的药物不依从性。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Dec 6;15:E148. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180190.
6
Ensuring access to prescription medications in the post-ACA healthcare access landscape: the essential role of FQHCs in the safety net for the underinsured.确保在后 ACA 医疗保健准入环境中获得处方药物:FQHC 在为保险不足者提供安全网方面的重要作用。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Mar;24(5 Suppl):S67-S73.
7
The Economic Burden of Asthma in the United States, 2008-2013.美国 2008-2013 年哮喘经济负担
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Mar;15(3):348-356. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-259OC.
8
The Association of Patient-centered Medical Home Designation With Quality of Care of HRSA-funded Health Centers: A Longitudinal Analysis of 2012-2015.患者为中心的医疗之家指定与 HRSA 资助的医疗中心的医疗质量之间的关联:2012-2015 年的纵向分析。
Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):130-138. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000862.
9
Income is an independent risk factor for worse asthma outcomes.收入是哮喘结局恶化的独立危险因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Feb;141(2):754-760.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 May 20.
10
Exploring factors associated with asthma-related emergency department visits among adults: A path analysis approach.探讨与成年人哮喘相关急诊就诊相关的因素:路径分析方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jan;14(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Jan 23.