Jiménez-Escrig A, Fernandez-Lorente J, Herrero A, Baron M, Lousa M, de Blas G, Gobernado J
S. de Neurología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2002;13(1):27-32. doi: 10.1159/000048630.
There are no studies on event-related cognitive potentials in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). In order to evaluate the aptitude and usefulness of the event-related P300 potential in this disease, we prospectively examined 60 cases: 11 patients with FTD diagnosed according to the Lund and Manchester criteria and Neary consensus criteria, 33 patients with a probable Alzheimer's disease diagnosis following NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, and 16 normal controls. P300 latency, amplitude and reaction time were recorded using an auditory oddball paradigm. In this sample, P300 potential could be reliably performed by 10/11 FTD patients, notwithstanding their language or executive function deficiencies. The FTD group P300 mean latency was midway between the normal controls and the Alzheimer's disease group (ANOVA F(2, 74199) = 16.5; p = 0.00003). The latency range of the FTD patients were within normal values (average plus 1.96 standard deviation of the values of the control group), except for one case with a latency of 448 ms. Post hoc Newman-Keuls analysis showed that the P300 latencies of the control and FTD groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.15) and that the Alzheimer's disease group had a delayed P300 latency that differed significantly from that of the FTD (p = 0.002) and control group (p = 0.0002). However, there was overlapping in P300 latency values of the three groups. Despite these differences in latencies, the reaction time was significantly increased in the FTD and the Alzheimer's disease groups. These findings indicate that the P300 potential is less affected in patients with FTD than those with Alzheimer's disease. This fact could aid in FTD diagnosis, differential diagnosis with Alzheimer's disease and possibly its clinical management.
目前尚无关于额颞叶痴呆(FTD)事件相关认知电位的研究。为了评估事件相关P300电位在该疾病中的适用性和实用性,我们前瞻性地检查了60例患者:11例根据隆德和曼彻斯特标准以及Neary共识标准诊断为FTD的患者,33例根据NINCDS-ADRDA标准诊断为可能的阿尔茨海默病的患者,以及16例正常对照者。使用听觉Oddball范式记录P300潜伏期、波幅和反应时间。在这个样本中,尽管11例FTD患者存在语言或执行功能缺陷,但其中10例仍能可靠地完成P300电位检测。FTD组的P300平均潜伏期介于正常对照组和阿尔茨海默病组之间(方差分析F(2, 74199) = 16.5;p = 0.00003)。除1例潜伏期为448毫秒的患者外,FTD患者的潜伏期范围在正常值内(对照组值的平均值加1.96个标准差)。事后纽曼-基尔斯分析表明,对照组和FTD组的P300潜伏期无显著差异(p = 0.15),阿尔茨海默病组的P3波潜伏期延迟,与FTD组(p = 0.002)和对照组(p = 0.0002)有显著差异。然而,三组的P300潜伏期值存在重叠。尽管潜伏期存在这些差异,但FTD组和阿尔茨海默病组的反应时间均显著延长。这些发现表明,FTD患者的P300电位受影响程度低于阿尔茨海默病患者。这一事实可能有助于FTD的诊断、与阿尔茨海默病的鉴别诊断以及可能的临床管理。